BBO Discussion Forums: LTC for an 8 bagger - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

LTC for an 8 bagger

#1 User is offline   matmat 

  • ded
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,459
  • Joined: 2005-August-11
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 2008-August-27, 22:09

how many losers (according to the LTC) is the suit:
A9xxxxxx?
0

#2 User is offline   effervesce 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 885
  • Joined: 2007-March-28

Posted 2008-August-27, 22:16

Two losers. One loser per A/K/Q missing in a suit. If partner has xx support (a reasonable chance), it's likely to have just one loser so treating it as 1 loser ok.
Ming

--Always remember you're unique. Just like everyone else.
0

#3 User is offline   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,932
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2008-August-28, 00:14

2.

But the LTC works not very well for 7-2 fits,
and similar for 8-? fits.
As it is, if you indicate to partner, that you have
a long suit, he should switch to counting cover
cards instead of counting loosers.

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#4 User is offline   pclayton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,151
  • Joined: 2003-June-11
  • Location:Southern California

Posted 2008-August-28, 09:43

If you are into this kind of voodoo, I'd evaluate it is as 1.5 losers (average 1.7 around the table). If pard raises, then its 1/2.
"Phil" on BBO
0

#5 User is offline   helene_t 

  • The Abbess
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,397
  • Joined: 2004-April-22
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Odense, Denmark
  • Interests:History, languages

Posted 2008-August-28, 10:30

An ace is - 1 1/2 loser so it's 3 - 1 1/2 = 1 1/2 loser. Of course common sense says that with such such a long suit you must sometimes subtract from 2 rather than 3. If I were to formalize LTC for 8-cards I would take the probability that no opp has a 3-card into account. I suppose it would be something like 1 LTC for this hand.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users