(1) asked by West and explained as "penalties"
Result: 3NT (W) -2, NS +100
EW queried the penalty double of 2♠ at the end of the hand. The TD asked South if he agreed with the description, and he said he did. The TD further asked if he expected his partner to pass his double most of the time, and he again said he did.
EW maintained they would not have bid on over 2♠X had they known South could have had such a hand.
--------------------------------------
Part 2
I could have made this ruling number 9, but I don't want to risk boring you any more. This is what happened at another table where a TD was called, just to show you there is more than one route to 3NT:
..P...2♥..X(1)..2NT(2)
..P...3♣...X.....3♥
..P.....P....X....P
3♠....P...3NT...P
..P.....P
(1) God knows
(2) Alerted and explained as Lebensohl (!)
I have no idea what the rest of the auction meant, how many it went off, nor who put in a claim for what damage. I think we decided they were all beyond the help of the directing staff.

Help

..P....P...1♦..2♠
..P....P..X(1)..P
..P..3♥...P..3NT
..P....P...P