Do not have any way to show a good 4M opening
What's your call?
#1
Posted 2011-January-03, 23:05
Do not have any way to show a good 4M opening
#2
Posted 2011-January-03, 23:29
Extremely tough call, id probably x at the table and lead a spade, even at these colors
www.longbeachbridge.com
#3
Posted 2011-January-03, 23:50
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#4
Posted 2011-January-04, 01:12
This seems like a tougher problem at IMP scoring actually, where it might pay to bid 5♥ because the size of the loss for turning a small plus into a small minus is small, whereas the size of the win on a potential double-game-swing is huge.
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
#5
Posted 2011-January-04, 04:25
I don't see why 5♥ shouldn't be making anyway. Partner's allowed to have an outside ace.
#6
Posted 2011-January-04, 05:00
gnasher, on 2011-January-04, 04:25, said:
But then you would lose ♥A instead?, seems like 5♥ will be off 3 aces no matter wich ones, and possibly a second spade trick.
If partner has a 7-4 with a minor wich is kinda likelly opponents are making 4♠ probably, so 5♥ can be right even non making.
All of this depends on how insane partner is in third position, if he already pushed opponents to an unsafe level it would be stupid to bid again to -500. Witha sound partner I'd bid 5♥ but I know a couple of players with whom I'd just pass
#7
Posted 2011-January-04, 05:01
#8
Posted 2011-January-04, 05:34
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
My YouTube Channel
#9
Posted 2011-January-04, 05:43
#10
Posted 2011-January-04, 10:56
I would nearly guarentee partner has 0 or 1 spade and solid hearts. With the A's we're missing onside wont we be makin 4 or 5, and them be cold for 4S also? Or is p is a bit stronger with not necessarily the supreme heart suit we're gonna get lots on defense. I think the pt. is that Partner needs to be stronger for 4H than RHO needs to be for 4S.
www.longbeachbridge.com
#11
Posted 2011-January-04, 11:43
Rik
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not “Eureka!” (I found it!), but “That’s funny…” – Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg
#12
Posted 2011-January-04, 11:51
#13
Posted 2011-January-04, 12:50
Copying and pasting what he said " I'd bid 5H, such a good chance your making it"
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#14
Posted 2011-January-04, 14:26
#15
Posted 2011-January-04, 16:24
#16
Posted 2011-January-04, 18:56
What is the shape around the table? Maybe RHO is 7006, and LHO is 3271 (with diamonds too weak to preempt), and clubs are 3-3 so they only need to ruff 2 clubs to set them up. That was pretty hard to come up with actually!
#17
Posted 2011-January-05, 02:59
We're likely down 1 or 2 in hearts, and if partner has 1 defensive trick and my minors cough up 2 tricks, they're likely making 4S. Double is better only when they go down - which is possible but I am not convinced it is 50% -- and 5H is only right when they make and we're down only 1, or when we make -- which I don't think is anywhere remotely close to 50%.
That's kind of an odd setup, really.
5H and 4S both make: 5H > pass > double.
4S makes, we are down 1: 5H > pass > double
4S makes, we are down 2: pass > 5H > double
4S makes, we are down 3: pass > double > 5H
4S fails, we are down: double > pass > 5H
If you are shooting for a top, 5H has a plurality. If you are avoiding a bottom, pass is the standout.
It's going to depend a lot on your preempting style. But you need hyper-soundness, not just classical preempting, to make 5H make more than half the time, and you need a fair bit of defense from partner to make doubling right more than half the time.
On reflection I still think it's a pretty clear matchpoint pass. (Though you can construct partners and fields that make each of the 3 actions right.) Most fields I've ever seen, there is no such thing as a unanimous 1st or 2nd seat 4H opening -- invariably a third of them will prefer 3H or a third of them will prefer 1H. At those other tables there's a lower-level decision going on, which IMO makes 5H an even worse bid, because even when it's a good sacrifice it will be down one more than people in 4H and won't be a good sacrifice against 3S.
#18
Posted 2011-January-05, 04:20
#19
Posted 2011-January-05, 04:29
JLOGIC, on 2011-January-04, 18:56, said:
What is the shape around the table? Maybe RHO is 7006, and LHO is 3271 (with diamonds too weak to preempt), and clubs are 3-3 so they only need to ruff 2 clubs to set them up. That was pretty hard to come up with actually!
zero quick tricks better?, we will likelly make 1 trick, unsurprisingly even 2, but it takes 4 tricks to defeat 4♠, 5 tricks to get 300. Playing opponents to have a nearly mirror 5134 doesn't work in my experience.
#20
Posted 2011-January-05, 09:06
-2) making or them bidding 5♠. 5♥ could even be 1100 though (xxx KQT9xxxx x x looks like a reasonable 3rd seat 4♥ to me), and surely they won't miss the double in that case. I think I would want to be at the table for this problem - partner's style and the opponents' tendencies are pretty important. Assuming partner is sane I think I would still bid 5♥ and hope for something good to be happening. At least I have 3 ways to win (one shot at each contract making, plus them bidding 5♠).

Help
