Your lead? Is it automatic? If not, what else are you considering? (This was played at MP, but I suspect it makes little difference.)
Automatic? Lead problem
#1
Posted 2011-February-24, 07:56
Your lead? Is it automatic? If not, what else are you considering? (This was played at MP, but I suspect it makes little difference.)
"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other.” -- Hamman, re: Wolff
#2
Posted 2011-February-24, 08:33
Never tell the same lie twice. - Elim Garek on the real moral of "The boy who cried wolf"
#3
Posted 2011-February-24, 08:49
#5
Posted 2011-February-24, 09:06
Cyberyeti, on 2011-February-24, 08:49, said:
2D would be natural for us, for better or for worse. I could have bid 2N, but I don't consider bidding 1S here that strange.
"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other.” -- Hamman, re: Wolff
#7
Posted 2011-February-24, 09:26
p cant depend on us have such a marvelous spade suit but they can see if
they have marvelous clubs (and an outside entry).
OR in a slightly more gambling mode something like AQJ of clubs 2 small spades and maybe another card hoping to use club entries to lead spades through rho.
#8
Posted 2011-February-24, 11:55
#9
Posted 2011-February-24, 13:12
Maybe it's possible RHO has Jxxx in spades and partner has doubled with Ax to make sure I lead one but probably the double is just to increase the penalty since they have bid a thin game and suits are breaking very badly for them.
#11
Posted 2011-February-25, 12:29
"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other.” -- Hamman, re: Wolff
#12
Posted 2011-February-25, 12:56
#13
Posted 2011-February-25, 13:16
Quote
Because where I come from ♠K is standard from that holding.
Having seen the play, I'm surprised that you're so concerned about the opening lead. The main problem seems to have been partner's play of ♦10 at trick two, which is a bit of a shocker. If he plays low, I don't think declarer can make it, even double-dummy.
#14
Posted 2011-February-25, 13:29
gnasher, on 2011-February-25, 13:16, said:
Having seen the play, I'm surprised that you're so concerned about the opening lead. The main problem seems to have been partner's play of ♦10 at trick two, which is a bit of a shocker. If he plays low, I don't think declarer can make it, even double-dummy.
The issue was that pard was upset that I didn't lead a club, which he thought the X called for, and after which the defense is basically trivial.
Agree wholeheartedly re: the diamond. I don't know how he thought declarer was getting to hand, but he tanked for awhile before putting the 10 in.
"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other.” -- Hamman, re: Wolff