Partner opens 1NT 15-17
#1
Posted 2011-August-25, 08:32
♠T9
♥AQJ852
♦JT
♣T42
What do you bid?
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
My YouTube Channel
#2
Posted 2011-August-25, 08:39
Hanoi5, on 2011-August-25, 08:32, said:
♠T9
♥AQJ852
♦JT
♣T42
What do you bid?
I transfer to hearts
I bid game over any superaccept
I rebid 3H over 2H
#3
Posted 2011-August-25, 08:39
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#4
Posted 2011-August-25, 08:45
"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other. -- Hamman, re: Wolff
#5
Posted 2011-August-25, 09:39
2♦, if pard 2♥ then 3♥, if any bid showing 4♥-cards 4♥
at matchpoint:
full game, depending on system 2♦ and raise, or 4♦
#6
Posted 2011-August-25, 09:45
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw
#7
Posted 2011-August-25, 09:51
George Carlin
#8
Posted 2011-August-25, 09:53
#9
Posted 2011-August-25, 09:54
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#10
Posted 2011-August-25, 11:42
wyman, on 2011-August-25, 08:45, said:
MrAce, on 2011-August-25, 09:54, said:
Ho hum it's all been said. I can only add that the side suit tens helped convince me.
-gwnn
#12
Posted 2011-August-25, 13:31
#13
Posted 2011-August-25, 13:35
I suspect that this question would be far closer. I'm not saying that the answer wouldn't still favour bidding....I don't know and it is difficult to simulate since, especially knowing what dummy holds, we will have trouble being objective in deciding go/no go hands.
#14
Posted 2011-August-25, 14:58
gwnn, on 2011-August-25, 09:51, said:
I assumed this was why the hand was posted.
I say this with all due respect mike and richard, I think you've lost your minds inviting with this hand! 3N needs very little from a 1N opener.
The problem with standard methods is they don't deal with this hand (6322 choice of games) very well. And those hands come in two types. One is 6 weakish hearts with extras and scattered values. 3N will often be better, but you can transfer and bid 3N reasonably effectively with that since there is a correlation in wanting to play in hearts opposite 3, but not opposite 2 (but still it's not great). The other is something like AQ(j)xxx or KQ(J)xxx of hearts, where you might have 9 rippers and 4 losers.
I think if you are looking to beef up your NT system adding in a way to handle this hand type is really good, I play 2D then 3D as showing 2 of the top honors 6th, inv+ currently so partner can bid 3N if that looks correct with much more confidence.
I think just going 1N-3N is a pretty reasonable shot with this hand, albeit high variance. I think transfer then 3N is not all that reasonable because one of the main times you would want to play hearts is when partner has 2 small hearts. Though if your partner will pass it with all 4333s then it's probably ok, you get to 4H opposite 3 hearts and a doubleton (good) or 4 hearts (might be bad but whatever). So if you can show basically 5332 choice of games that is probably good.
When I look at this hand I do think "notrump" though.
#15
Posted 2011-August-25, 15:03
#16
Posted 2011-August-26, 04:08
#17
Posted 2011-August-26, 04:43
Game, on the other hand, should be bid. Thus get pard to play 4♥, as it should be best from his side of the table.
#18
Posted 2011-August-29, 03:02
jonottawa, on 2011-August-25, 15:03, said:
Jacoby followed by 3NT won't get much support for the reason Justin has already given: whether 4H or 3NT is better won't depend on partner's heart length, in fact you are more likely to be better in hearts when partner has a doubleton.
At matchpoints that's actually a good reason to transfer then bid 3H, invitational with 6 hearts, because partner can bid 3NT over it.
I also don't think a simulation will help: my experience on these hands is that even when you know what partner has, it's often not clear which game is better.