rhm, on 2011-November-16, 07:28, said:
I do not really see why a world-class LHO needs to be 1=4=3=5 or 1=3=4=5.
Why could that ♦ discard not be from 1=2=5=5?
Why could that ♦ discard not be from 1=2=5=5?
You make a valid point. However, 1=4=3=5 is more likely than 1=2=5=5 (a priori and we have no evidence to suggest otherwise) AND 1=3=4=5 is mor likely than 1=2=5=5. So the combined chance of 1=4=3=5 and 1=3=4=5 must be much greater than playing for specifically 1=2=5=5.