Help
2 clubs promises 10+ points, 5+ clubs, and no four card major.
Page 1 of 1
Inverted Minor Raises Interference
#1
- Slightly less bad player
-
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 964
- Joined: 2012-October-16
- Gender:Female
- Interests:Bridge
Posted 2012-November-17, 09:33
Inverted minor raises give me a headache.
2 clubs promises 10+ points, 5+ clubs, and no four card major.
2 clubs promises 10+ points, 5+ clubs, and no four card major.
Become yourself.
#2
- Admirer of Walter the Walrus
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 2,563
- Joined: 2003-November-14
- Gender:Male
- Location:Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
- Interests:Bridge, surfing, water skiing, cricket, golf. Generally being outside really.
Posted 2012-November-17, 10:16
Out of the choices given, I call 3D. I would prefer to have 3S as an option.
#3
- Slightly less bad player
-
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 964
- Joined: 2012-October-16
- Gender:Female
- Interests:Bridge
Posted 2012-November-17, 10:26
mr1303, on 2012-November-17, 10:16, said:
Out of the choices given, I call 3D. I would prefer to have 3S as an option.
There is an "other" option
Would 3♠ show a control in spades or just extra values?
Become yourself.
#4
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 3,197
- Joined: 2010-April-22
- Gender:Male
- Location:Hamilton, Canada
- Interests:Bridge duh!
Posted 2012-November-17, 12:22
3♦ seems clear cheapest control on way to possible slam
can bid 3 or 4 ♠ at next turn and shows diamond stopper were partner has 3N hand but no ♦ stopper
can bid 3 or 4 ♠ at next turn and shows diamond stopper were partner has 3N hand but no ♦ stopper
Sarcasm is a state of mind
#5
- World International Master without a clue
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 17,404
- Joined: 2003-November-13
- Gender:Male
- Location:madrid
Posted 2012-November-17, 16:30
first reaction is 4♠, but before bidding it we need to know if we will accept a 5♣ sing off. Would partner bid 5♣ with ♠Qxx ♥Ax ♦xxx ♣Axxxx? maybe, and we make grand there!, I am not accepting a sing off so maybe 4♠ is not the best bid avaible, maybe 3♥ to be followed by 5♠, we want partner to know heart honnors/doubleton are important, bidding 3♦ acomplishes little, he won't like his usual ♦xxxx or ♦xxx. I think it is a bid to avoid.
So 3♥ for me, if partner bids 3NT by himself then perhaps missing slam is possible.
So 3♥ for me, if partner bids 3NT by himself then perhaps missing slam is possible.
#6
- 2011 Poster of The Year winner
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 6,002
- Joined: 2010-July-08
- Gender:Male
Posted 2012-November-18, 04:59
Three spades seems right to me, showing a good hand with spade shortness is my number one priority at this point.
blogging at http://www.justinlall.com
#7
- VIP Member
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 6,971
- Joined: 2009-November-14
- Gender:Male
- Location:Houston, TX
Posted 2012-November-18, 06:28
JLOGIC, on 2012-November-18, 04:59, said:
Three spades seems right to me, showing a good hand with spade shortness is my number one priority at this point.
Does it really promise spade shortness too ? If so i am all up for it.
"Genius has its own limitations, however stupidity has no such boundaries!"
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#8
- Alchemist
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 1,764
- Joined: 2004-June-15
- Gender:Male
- Location:Beside a little lake in northwestern Montana
- Interests:Creator of the 'grbbridge' LaTeX typesetting package.
Posted 2012-November-18, 20:12
I think 3S is a splinter, same as 1C-2C-3S would be without the interference.
Page 1 of 1
