I decided to bid Multi 2♦ Would you consider overcalling 2♥ as ♥+minor? What is your lead here given partner double (asking lead in your long suit), and what minimum would you expect for partner double? What meaning is std meaning of X if i would bid 2♥ instead of 2♦ multi?
Page 1 of 1
opps opened 1NT... competetive bidding and lead problem
#1
Posted 2013-February-14, 06:55
Your opponnents open std 15-17NT, you play multiLandy vs NT and hold this nice hand.here
I decided to bid Multi 2♦ Would you consider overcalling 2♥ as ♥+minor? What is your lead here given partner double (asking lead in your long suit), and what minimum would you expect for partner double? What meaning is std meaning of X if i would bid 2♥ instead of 2♦ multi?
I decided to bid Multi 2♦ Would you consider overcalling 2♥ as ♥+minor? What is your lead here given partner double (asking lead in your long suit), and what minimum would you expect for partner double? What meaning is std meaning of X if i would bid 2♥ instead of 2♦ multi?
#2
Posted 2013-February-14, 13:09
i think it would be far better to bid 2h becasue that way your p realizes that a major
part of the reason you are competing is because of distribution. They may not want
to x under those circumstances. I would expect p to have a couple of aces and a
balanced hand. P probably expects to be able to set up your "suit" quickly and get
in a quick set. If you had shown 2 suits p might not have been so quick to x.
remember not vulnerable does not mean invulnerable:)))))
part of the reason you are competing is because of distribution. They may not want
to x under those circumstances. I would expect p to have a couple of aces and a
balanced hand. P probably expects to be able to set up your "suit" quickly and get
in a quick set. If you had shown 2 suits p might not have been so quick to x.
remember not vulnerable does not mean invulnerable:)))))
Page 1 of 1