x xx xx KJ97xxxx
#1
Posted 2015-November-29, 00:27
Your hand is actually x xx xx KJ97xxxx so one more club and one less point the partner knows. You can pass 3N or show a stronger preference for
clubs by bidding 4C (non-forcing) or 5C. What do you do and why?
#2
Posted 2015-November-29, 03:21
#3
Posted 2015-December-03, 19:31
Also explain each bid which is artificial.
#4
Posted 2015-December-03, 23:07
jogs, on 2015-December-03, 19:31, said:
Also explain each bid which is artificial.
1C-2C 16+.......unbalanced with clubs, 2-5 Queen points (A=3, K=2, Q-1) or roughly 5-10 hcps
2D-2H asks.....6+ clubs, no other suit
2S-2N asks.....higher shortness or balanced
3C-3S asks.....1237 or 1327
3N-..................placing the contract
#5
Posted 2015-December-04, 00:16
straube, on 2015-November-29, 00:27, said:
Your hand is actually x xx xx KJ97xxxx so one more club and one less point the partner knows. You can pass 3N or show a stronger preference for
clubs by bidding 4C (non-forcing) or 5C. What do you do and why?
4c seems so clear given your system not sure what the question is.
I show 5-10 hcp...and longer clubs nonforcing over passing 3nt again I bid over 3nt
4c non forcing but we expect pard to bid again often...very often over 3nt you should add that to your explanation.
#6
Posted 2015-December-04, 01:40
It sounds like most recommend 4C and that describing this hand is worth missing the possibility of a making 3N. Thanks for your opinions, sounds like 4C is the right call.
#7
Posted 2015-December-04, 04:48
6322 - 3
6331 - 3
7222 - 1
7321 - 6
7330 - 3
...plus an additional 3 for 8221 making 19 in all. Of course you lose something by incorporating the extra 3 sequences but if you are going to go past 3NT when holding such a hand anyway you might be better off just accepting the trade off.
#8
Posted 2015-December-04, 05:21
straube, on 2015-November-29, 00:27, said:
Your hand is actually x xx xx KJ97xxxx so one more club and one less point the partner knows. You can pass 3N or show a stronger preference for
clubs by bidding 4C (non-forcing) or 5C. What do you do and why?
For it to be right you need two extra tricks. I don't think that the extra club fills this role well enough to overrule partner here, so pass. In fact, I would expect 4C to be forward-going within context of what I've shown and I really don't want to suggest the 8th club makes slam a possibility on this hand.
#9
Posted 2015-December-04, 07:48
sfi, on 2015-December-04, 05:21, said:
you're assuming that partner knew our honour structure when he bid 3nt. he didn't. he had every right to expect some cards outside clubs. we don't have any. if he has a normal misfitting strong hand, he'll be very disappointed with what comes down in dummy.
#11
Posted 2015-December-04, 08:14
Zelandakh, on 2015-December-04, 04:48, said:
6322 - 3
6331 - 3
7222 - 1
7321 - 6
7330 - 3
...plus an additional 3 for 8221 making 19 in all. Of course you lose something by incorporating the extra 3 sequences but if you are going to go past 3NT when holding such a hand anyway you might be better off just accepting the trade off.
How do you organize that? But we cannot have 5332 and are using 2N+ for the single-suited with 6.
#12
Posted 2015-December-04, 08:51
straube, on 2015-November-29, 00:27, said:
Your hand is actually x xx xx KJ97xxxx so one more club and one less point the partner knows. You can pass 3N or show a stronger preference for
clubs by bidding 4C (non-forcing) or 5C. What do you do and why?
I think you can't ask this question in a vacuum. Would partner typically break the relays with unbalanced hands? If partner is at least likely to be semi-balanced, i.e. not have club shortness, I think I would remove.
#13
Posted 2015-December-04, 09:12
cherdano, on 2015-December-04, 08:51, said:
Partner can't break relays and force. A relay break suggests a contract. So partner could be void clubs here.
#14
Posted 2015-December-04, 14:37
wank, on 2015-December-04, 07:48, said:
That's one of the common problems playing a relay system - it's hard to pinpoint strength. The one I play has lots of breaks into cooperative bidding where this might be a problem. Even though I notice this auction is the only way to game force here, I still don't think my hand is unusual enough to bid on.
#16
Posted 2015-December-04, 20:30
Can 5c be making with 3nt down? Sure but this is a small target and I have no real indication that this is the case.
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
#17
Posted 2015-December-05, 00:15
i'd say that playing 3NT on this hand is actually a narrow target - you need partner to have a club fit and there be 3 losers in 5c (partner's playing that too helpfully) or for partner to have 9 tricks outside clubs yet settled for 3NT rather than investigating slam, essentially playing our hand to be useless.
if you did pass on this hand, i'd say you should adopt AWM's suggestion and make 4C forcing. your hand's as bad for 3NT as it could be but you chose not to use the nf option when you had it available.
#19
Posted 2015-December-05, 03:27
If I were tosr relaying I'd show it by 3h (but partner wouldn't know my strength and actually I wouldn't relay as we need 2 kkontrols to relay).
#20
Posted 2015-December-05, 04:00
Mbodell, on 2015-December-05, 03:27, said:
If I were tosr relaying I'd show it by 3h (but partner wouldn't know my strength and actually I wouldn't relay as we need 2 kkontrols to relay).
you're answering the question based on what you think the system should be, not based on what it actually is. 4C is specified as non-forcing.