4th hand monitoring of differences
#1
Posted 2016-July-08, 23:50
(pass) - pass - (pass) - 1♦
(pass) - 1♥ - (pass) - ?
If your answer depends on the zone and the method of calculation, please say.
#2
Posted 2016-July-09, 04:02
#3
Posted 2016-July-09, 21:19
#4
Posted 2016-July-10, 00:12
#8
Posted 2016-July-12, 15:02
4321, on 2016-July-08, 23:50, said:
(pass) - pass - (pass) - 1♦
(pass) - 1♥ - (pass) - ?
If your answer depends on the zone and the method of calculation, please say.
2s seems normal now, nothing fancy
I guess my answer depends on the fact that we get to assume pard is a true expert/wc player and knows I am not.
#9
Posted 2016-July-12, 22:07
1. No reason to show diamonds, we don't seek 6 or 7d after partner's pass.
2. We prepare to play from our strong hand.
3. We could find our spade easy.
But we could not find 3d. So? Probability of 3d is not high. May be 3c or 3H...
But now, after 1d opening we can hide our spade and expect spade lead. 3NT with spade fit better than 2/3NT from weak partner's hand after club lead.
#10
Posted 2016-July-12, 23:26
#11
Posted 2016-July-13, 00:58
#12
Posted 2016-July-13, 02:32
4321, on 2016-July-13, 00:58, said:
If not it doesn't matter which side it's played from.
London UK
#13
Posted 2016-July-13, 06:25
#14
Posted 2016-July-13, 07:34
#15
Posted 2016-July-13, 07:36
#16
Posted 2016-July-13, 18:17