BBO Discussion Forums: GIBBO Lunacy or My Lunacy? Seems former - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

GIBBO Lunacy or My Lunacy? Seems former GIBidding

#1 User is offline   virgosrock 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 782
  • Joined: 2015-April-07

Posted 2017-November-26, 11:03



Should I bid 2H instead of x? GIBBO may have tons of d so I can't
Should GIBBO bid 2H? if i bid 3H over 2H then GIBBO can bid 3NT to show same hand.

I say this is GIBug-ish.

vrock
0

#2 User is offline   Stephen Tu 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,097
  • Joined: 2003-May-14

Posted 2017-November-26, 11:23

Definitely Gib lunacy.
0

#3 User is offline   steve2005 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,162
  • Joined: 2010-April-22
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Hamilton, Canada
  • Interests:Bridge duh!

Posted 2017-November-26, 12:45

 virgosrock, on 2017-November-26, 11:03, said:

Should I bid 2H instead of x? GIBBO may have tons of d so I can't

Should always be straining to double on this sequence.
The most likely good hand partner has ♦ and doubling is only way to collect a penalty.

Gib not showing 5♥ simply means another flaw in programming.


Sarcasm is a state of mind
0

#4 User is offline   TylerE 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,760
  • Joined: 2006-January-30

Posted 2017-November-27, 00:27

 steve2005, on 2017-November-26, 12:45, said:

Should always be straining to double on this sequence.
The most likely good hand partner has ♦ and doubling is only way to collect a penalty.


Yes, but this is GIB. GIB never passes even with 7♦.

Playing with GIB 2♥ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> X
0

#5 User is offline   johnu 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 5,033
  • Joined: 2008-September-10
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2017-November-27, 04:49

 steve2005, on 2017-November-26, 12:45, said:

Should always be straining to double on this sequence.


This may be true playing with an actual bridge player. It's not clear playing with GIB because there is a long history of major disasters when doubling (any type of double) with GIB as partner.
0

#6 User is offline   iandayre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,114
  • Joined: 2013-December-23
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2017-November-27, 13:50

 TylerE, on 2017-November-27, 00:27, said:

Yes, but this is GIB. GIB never passes even with 7♦.

Playing with GIB 2♥ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> X


This is false. If anything GIB passes too often in this type of sequence. But when holding a trump stack it will do the right thing. Double was clear cut.
1

#7 User is offline   gszes 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,660
  • Joined: 2011-February-12

Posted 2017-November-27, 14:45

look at the gib definition of X 11-21 hcp and distribution when viewed from that prism 2n is not as out of bounds as it seems asking opener to bid 3n if near max. Having said that it is decidedly not BRIDGE since the overwhelming majority of hands opener will be closer to 11 than 21 AND if opener is that close to 21 they will raise a 2h bid to 3h. The fault lies with basic programming defects that i have given up trying to address. GIB is a tool to help pass the time but forget about trying to
do anything serious with it (imho). With gib i would bid 2h with a human x its that simple.
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users