BBO Discussion Forums: Bid after slow signoff - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Bid after slow signoff

#21 User is online   Cyberyeti 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,168
  • Joined: 2009-July-13
  • Location:England

Posted 2018-June-07, 13:09

View PostStevenG, on 2018-June-07, 12:16, said:

Given that's how most of the older moderate players around here play (minor on 4432, no checkback), I think almost all of them would invite with 3♥, because there's no other sensible option. If you do play checkback, then pass is pretty automatic - oddly enough a strong tournament partnership had an almost identical sequence at the club on Tuesday evening, and missed game because responder bid 2♥ rather than 2♣ checkback.


I wondered about 2N if partner's theoretically denied spades -3♥-4♥, absolutely hate 3♥, used to play that as unequivocally 6+♥ and a choice between 3/4♥ taking 3N out of the picture. But they have given themselves an issue by denying a spade suit the way they play, imagine if N was 4243, 3♥ would not be a thing of beauty.
0
  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users