Cyberyeti, on 2020-July-04, 11:43, said:
In order to almost be certain it is not reasonable 4♥ vulnerable, you need an opening bid for west on a hand like this;
♠ 7 5 3, ♥ Q J 7 5, ♦ A 9 7 5 3, ♣ 8
Do you? That would be pretty effective here indeed.
Posted 2020-July-05, 05:19
Cyberyeti, on 2020-July-04, 11:43, said:
Posted 2020-July-05, 05:44
Huibertus, on 2020-July-05, 05:19, said:
Posted 2020-July-05, 06:38
nekthen, on 2020-July-04, 10:07, said:
Posted 2020-July-05, 08:23
Huibertus, on 2020-July-05, 05:19, said:
Posted 2020-July-05, 11:17
mikeh, on 2020-July-05, 08:23, said:
Posted 2020-July-05, 12:43
bluenikki, on 2020-July-04, 16:38, said:
Posted 2020-July-05, 12:57
bluenikki, on 2020-July-05, 11:17, said:
Posted 2020-July-06, 15:20
Cyberyeti, on 2020-July-05, 12:57, said:
Nethken "This went for 800.
Do you think partner should stick his neck out with an SOS xx?"
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Bidding problem reposted to BridgeWinners
https://bridgewinner...m-2-a5xvjhlai6/
MikeH and CyberYeti sussed it out Hard luck Nethken With different views declarer might escape for -500. But that wouldn't be much consolation
IMO East shouldn't SOS-redouble with his actual hand. With a ♥ void, he might consider it, especially at pairs.