Now for GIB 4♣ is natural, but as it does not deny the 5-card ♥, I really don't get the Pass, but I assume it is because BEN never had been trained with that sequence.
Ben on BBO - Feedback thread Discussions about Ben models trained on BBO data
#161
Posted 2024-August-07, 15:53
A splinter disaster
Now for GIB 4♣ is natural, but as it does not deny the 5-card ♥, I really don't get the Pass, but I assume it is because BEN never had been trained with that sequence.
Now for GIB 4♣ is natural, but as it does not deny the 5-card ♥, I really don't get the Pass, but I assume it is because BEN never had been trained with that sequence.
I am BEN the Bridge ENgine
#162
Posted 2024-August-13, 07:56
Annoying that BEN is not bidding the same each time
23 players saw BEN bid the very strange 2♥
One lucky player got the more natural 2♠ and scored 100%.
Also worth noting the failure to cover ♠9 at trick 7.
23 players saw BEN bid the very strange 2♥
One lucky player got the more natural 2♠ and scored 100%.
Also worth noting the failure to cover ♠9 at trick 7.
I am BEN the Bridge ENgine
#163
Posted 2024-August-15, 09:25
Testing two different models from BEN in the wild I noticed this strange situation.
Just to clarify: I am using the Open Source version of BEN as participant in the BEN and Freinds daily, so there are 4 BEN's but one (south) is not controlled by BBO
e
Down 1 and a fine score of 64%
Using the new bidding model all was the same until trick 6, where BEN suddenly found a much better plan.
Making an overtrick and a score of 1.2%
Please remove the randomness in the BBO-BEN
Just to clarify: I am using the Open Source version of BEN as participant in the BEN and Freinds daily, so there are 4 BEN's but one (south) is not controlled by BBO
e
Down 1 and a fine score of 64%
Using the new bidding model all was the same until trick 6, where BEN suddenly found a much better plan.
Making an overtrick and a score of 1.2%
Please remove the randomness in the BBO-BEN
I am BEN the Bridge ENgine
#164
Posted 2024-August-20, 10:16
I am not sure anyone still read this thread :-)
But this is interesting, because BEN haven't been trained in the default GIB system
Explanation is correct, but BBO-BEN just passed.
And yes, the south hand is not good enough for 4♥, but I will discuss that with the open source version of BEN.
But this is interesting, because BEN haven't been trained in the default GIB system
Explanation is correct, but BBO-BEN just passed.
And yes, the south hand is not good enough for 4♥, but I will discuss that with the open source version of BEN.
I am BEN the Bridge ENgine
#167
Posted 2024-October-02, 01:43
Post in the Ben on BBO BBO Forums thread to be added to the tournament
#168
Posted 2024-October-04, 14:20
mstockyard, on 2024-September-22, 08:30, said:
Interested in playing w Ben in 8 board invite tourney.
If you are interested in playing with the Open Source version of BEN (Not the BBO version) I might be able to set it up.
As a start feel free to challenge the Robot on BBO (Name is TwoOneBEN). In a challenge you will play 3 GIB-robots, and the compare with your opponent. Then you can get an impression of the strength and especially weaknesses of the robot.
I am BEN the Bridge ENgine
#169
Posted 2024-October-09, 23:48
Is this a bidding misunderstanding? https://tinyurl.com/ytepqw8f
Fortuna Fortis Felix
#170
Posted 2024-October-25, 00:38
Ben bids like a human: https://tinyurl.com/22oc5kvm
Fortuna Fortis Felix
#171
Posted 2024-October-25, 01:47
pilowsky, on 2024-October-25, 00:38, said:
Ben bids like a human: https://tinyurl.com/22oc5kvm
Very unlucky hand where ♣A was in the wrong hand. And very unsporting of you to double.
#172
Posted 2024-October-25, 02:03
Auction seems to scream for a low club lead.
(I'm still trying to figure out how I scored more than 50% on this hand, though )
(I'm still trying to figure out how I scored more than 50% on this hand, though )