MPs. Seems a clear double the first round to me, but LHO bidding 1♠ and RHO reversing wasn't how I saw the auction proceeding. The opponents aren't ones to psych, though aren't strong players. What next?
Page 1 of 1
This one was wild
#1
Posted 2025-February-24, 02:26
MPs. Seems a clear double the first round to me, but LHO bidding 1♠ and RHO reversing wasn't how I saw the auction proceeding. The opponents aren't ones to psych, though aren't strong players. What next?
I have nothing worth contributing, bye
#2
Posted 2025-February-24, 03:10
First thought: 2♠.
On second thought: would opp rebid ♠ with 5? If so, pass looks attractive, intending to bid ♠ if opp does not show 5.
On second thought: would opp rebid ♠ with 5? If so, pass looks attractive, intending to bid ♠ if opp does not show 5.
#3
Posted 2025-February-24, 03:18
So partner has nothing and maybe a few clubs. I can see 8/9 tricks in ♠ and maybe more in ♣. 2♠ may be the end of it
#4
Posted 2025-February-24, 03:32
mw64ahw, on 2025-February-24, 03:18, said:
So partner has nothing and maybe a few clubs. I can see 8/9 tricks in ♠ and maybe more in ♣. 2♠ may be the end of it
Partner needs no more than xxxxx in clubs for 11 or Kxxxx for 12 potentially
Would have seriously considered 2♦ (specifically the blacks good/bad for us) first time
#5
Posted 2025-February-24, 04:09
2♦ is the majors here, so not a consideration.
I have nothing worth contributing, bye
#6
Posted 2025-February-24, 04:25
2♠ would be ♠ & ♣ limited for me, but usually with longer ♣ so I would need to double too.
#7
Posted 2025-February-24, 09:02
Does noone bid 1♠/1♦?
I bid 1♠, ♣'s next.
I bid 1♠, ♣'s next.
“It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that they are difficult.”
#10
Posted 2025-February-24, 10:44
Didn't we say 'cue under, natural over' or is this now different with 3 suits bid? 2S now looks like asking for a spade stopper.
Jim, yes this traditionally a double then bid hand. I am beginning to prefer bidding these 2 suited hands rather than starting with a X.
These hands don't come up very often, I will try to monitor my success rate.
edit; I wouldn't be surprised to see that we were fixed by our perhaps inexperienced opponents, and our failure to bid 1S
Jim, yes this traditionally a double then bid hand. I am beginning to prefer bidding these 2 suited hands rather than starting with a X.
These hands don't come up very often, I will try to monitor my success rate.
edit; I wouldn't be surprised to see that we were fixed by our perhaps inexperienced opponents, and our failure to bid 1S
“It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that they are difficult.”
#12
Posted 2025-February-24, 12:20
I was all set to bid 2♠, though then wondered what I was actually intending to achieve - there's no way partner is responding, and the opponents are already forced to the three level. Will bidding just help them more? Are the bidders planning to bid 4♣ next? Maybe 1♠ was right after all, though I still don't think I could risk that.
Anyway, I decided I'll pass and see what happens, and the auction continued to surprise..
Anyway, I decided I'll pass and see what happens, and the auction continued to surprise..
I have nothing worth contributing, bye
#13
Posted 2025-February-24, 12:36
Double and they will run. Pass , take the plus.
“It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that they are difficult.”
Page 1 of 1

Help
