[benellis58]

Another hand where the GIBBO piece of trash in the North forces to 3NT when he does NOT have a legitimate reason to do so. You'll note that the clueless jerk doesn't even adhere to his own GIB definition of 3D, which "guarantees" 12+ HCP.

Fortunately, 3NT made, but that does not justify the addlepated jabroni's bidding.

GIBBO robots are repulsive.

https://tinyurl.brid...se.com/2e3bhfu8

[benellis58]

It's amazing how these GIBBO imbeciles can keep finding new and "creative" ways to add to their world-famous collection of complete zeroes, as they did here.

East could have easily defeated 4H by winning trick one with his club king (as he did), then cashing the ace and playing a third round for West to ruff. That would already be three tricks, and they would be guaranteed to get at least one more (a spade).

However, East shifted at trick two. I had sown some doubt in his "mind" (DEFINITELY the WRONG word to use for a sickening GIBBO robot, which is as MINDLESS a thing as has EVER soiled our planet!) by dropping my queen of clubs (from Q963) under his king at trick one, but perhaps a larger problem is that he had played West to have led the TEN of clubs from a presumed holding of 109653. I think it's silly to lead the TEN from such a holding, as I think the CORRECT lead from that would be (if playing fourth best) the FIVE...but because these hopeless GIBBO losers LOVE wastefully and foolishly leading the TEN from such holdings, East had a dilemma: Was the 10 stiff, which would be a NORMAL lead...or was it from 10-doubleton, the type of stupid lead the robots love...or was it from 109-with length, as the robots stupidly also do? These clowns are ALREADY among the worst "bridge players" EVER..and they are NOT helped by the unbearably awful "thinking" (ha, ha, HA!) that produces their braindead leads.

So, East could NOT solve the "dilemma" created by the wretched leading philosophy they are cursed with, and he shifted. ALREADY that was bad, but why the HELL would the feebleminded sap shift to a DIAMOND when he was looking at the KJ3 (!) in dummy? These GIBBO robots stink. And...the M.O.R.O.N. couldn't EVEN shift to the CORRECT diamond (not that it would have mattered). The piece of trash shifted to the NINE of diamonds (Curse of Scotland) from 1092! The comedy NEVER ends with these useless dirtbags.

https://tinyurl.brid...se.com/mr2yk6z4

[benellis58]

How "good" are the GIB definitions? THIS "good": "East's 4D is defined as "2+ diamonds". That's IT, that's ALL. So I guess he could have TWO diamonds...OR he could have THIRTEEN. I guess he could have ZERO HCP...OR he could have THIRTY-SEVEN. I guess he could have a pancake flat 4-3-3-3 shape...OR... he could have 2 diamonds and 11 hearts...OR...ANYTHING else. Why does GIB even BOTHER writing a definition for 4D if it's just COMPLETELY USELESS GARBAGE such as this? Better yet: Why do GIB and GIBBO still EXIST?

https://tinyurl.brid...se.com/25t6rucf

[benellis58]

We're cold for 6D by South or 6S by either North or South. We stopped in 5S but scored a good 89.3 % anyway when we took all the tricks.

As South, I thought there could easily be a slam, but since I knew I was playing with a complete I.D.I.O.T., I decided to just bid 4S and avoid some insane sequence that my imbecile of a "partner" might concoct if I tried to get scientific. Over East's BELATED 5C call (yes, a DECENT East would have bid it on the PREVIOUS round, but East was a hopeless GIBBO robot, so of COURSE he passed on the previous round, simplistic stooge that he is), I bid 5D, intending it as natural and not even bothering to read the always pathetic GIB definition (which branded it as a cue bid).


Against 5S, the GIBBO M.O.R.O.N. on lead tabled - for absolutely NO discernible reason - the 4 of hearts from Q84. It was obviously MUCH too difficult for this braying GIBBO jackass to cash his club ace! Honestly, has anyone EVER seen a bridge player worse than these GIBBO monstrosities? I certainly haven't.

After Johnny Halfwit stupidly failed to lead a club, I had a cold 13 tricks - even with the annoyingly typical BBO layout of a Hawaii Five-O spade break.

https://tinyurl.brid...se.com/2p95b34k

[benellis58]

Have I mentioned that GIBBO robots are worse than even the WORST human player I have EVER encountered in MANY decades of playing bridge? Oh, I have? Sorry.

[benellis58]

HOPELESS "defence" by Frick and Frack:

https://tinyurl.brid...se.com/y73vp6sp

[benellis58]

And...another HOPELESS "defence" by Frick and Frack:

https://tinyurl.brid...se.com/2p9kbxrz

[benellis58]

If West had a brain, he would pass South's 1NT opener, since HE is on lead against no trump, and since he has the master suit, he can compete later anyway if it's "right" to do so. On THIS random hand, NS would barrel into 3NT and West would take the first SIX spade tricks, beating the contract two, and scoring plus 100.

But West DOESN'T have a brain. He's a brainDEAD GIBBO robot just like all the others, so HE showed an unknown single-suiter by bidding 2C and when his partner bid 2D asking for his suit, he bid 2S, which North wisely hammered.

The M.O.R.O.N. started with 6 tricks and ended with 6 tricks, thereby going down two for...minus 500, since the GENIUS had committed this atrocity red against white.

https://tinyurl.brid...se.com/2p87nwer

[benellis58]

Stupid GIBBO system, and STUPID hand evaluation to bid 3C even within the CONTEXT of the stupid system. Note that these jerks played in their 6-1 "fit" instead of their FIVE-FOUR FIT! Imbeciles.

https://tinyurl.brid...se.com/mwbpnwa7

[benellis58]

Another interesting thread:

https://www.bridgeba...ard-ending-how/

[benellis58]

A hand from OMARHEUM, who writes "93% on this board. Note the incorrect or incomplete description of 5S: no mention of the Blackwood response. When I bid 7NT, I figured Ox had to have more than the ace of diamonds and AQ 5th or 6th of hearts, so I pictured the spade king in his hand. Things still worked out."

My comment: This is one of the EXTREMELY rare hands where the GIBBO robots (all three of them!) did nothing wrong. That in itself makes this truly amazing!

OMAR has correctly pointed out, however, the typically pathetic GIB definition of 5S. 4NT had been defined as Blackwood for hearts and the robot had correctly shown two keys plus the queen, but the wretched GIB definition failed to say that. The response stupidly and uselessly merely repeated the same information that had described North's initial 2H call.

Even when a MIRACLE occurs and the GIBBO robots play perfectly (!!!!!), the GIB definition is still a piece of complete and utter garbage.

https://www.bridgeba...D3%7Cmc%7C13%7C

[benellis58]

Two personal observations:

One: GIBBO robots are by far the worst "bridge players" I have ever encountered in my entire life.

Two: GIB definitions are among the worst I have ever seen in ANY context, not JUST in bridge.