explain me the rules of this sequence
#1
Posted 2026-March-19, 08:18
I would like to understand what convention it is and how it works.
Thanks for any respons
#2
Posted 2026-March-19, 10:26
cencio, on 2026-March-19, 08:18, said:
I would like to understand what convention it is and how it works.
Thanks for any respons
This does not appear to be anything other then a Cue bid in diamonds showing interest in a spade slam. The whole auction needs to be shown to know what the exact meanings of 5♦ and 6♣ mean. You assumed Q♠ and K♣.
C3: Copious Canape Club is still my favorite system. (Ultra upgraded, PM for notes)
Santa Fe Precision ♣ published 8/19. TOP3 published 11/20. Magic experiment (Science Modernized) with Lenzo. 2020: Jan Eric Larsson's Cottontail ♣. 2020. BFUN (Bridge For the UNbalanced) 2021: Weiss Simplified ♣ (Canape & Relay). 2022: Canary ♣ Modernized, 2023-4: KOK Canape, 2025-6: Canape!
#4
Posted 2026-March-19, 12:38
2♣ game forcing in a 2/1 auction
2♥ natural
3♠ unusual jump but agreeing spades
4♠ natural
5♦ cue bid in support of spades, void (Ace , King, singleton or void)
6♣. cue bid, K
6♠
This does not resemble an expert standard auction but got the job done.
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
"Hysterical Raisins again - this time on the World stage, not just the ACBL" mycroft
#5
Posted 2026-March-19, 14:45
jillybean, on 2026-March-19, 12:38, said:
2♣ game forcing in a 2/1 auction
2♥ natural
3♠ unusual jump but agreeing spades
4♠ natural
5♦ cue bid in support of spades, void (Ace , King, singleton or void)
6♣. cue bid, K
6♠
This does not resemble an expert standard auction but got the job done.
3S ... it is always a debate, if 2S showes support or could be based on 2 cards, 3S also showes SI
4S min, 4C may be better, showing either A / K, but it is a crappy opening bid
5D is 1st round control, a void somewhere
6C I am not sure, I would have found the bid, but given that 2C showed clubs and 4S min,
it is a pretty good bid. I may have bailed out
I think the auction is not too bad.
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#6
Posted 2026-March-19, 21:43
P_Marlowe, on 2026-March-19, 14:45, said:
4S min, 4C may be better, showing either A / K, but it is a crappy opening bid
5D is 1st round control, a void somewhere
6C I am not sure, I would have found the bid, but given that 2C showed clubs and 4S min,
it is a pretty good bid. I may have bailed out
I think the auction is not too bad.
2S is not a debate and shows 3 card spade support for ambiguous 2♣GF players.
N/S got to the slam but its not a great auction.
cencio, I'd be wary of learning systems from watching BBO players, unless the players are known experts.
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
"Hysterical Raisins again - this time on the World stage, not just the ACBL" mycroft
#7
Posted Yesterday, 07:00
jillybean, on 2026-March-19, 21:43, said:
N/S got to the slam but its not a great auction.
I for one play ambiguous 2♣ and 2♠ that can be 2 card support: I don't see any contradiction between the two treatments, although I agree that 3 card support is playable and has its merits.
I think it's an awful auction by North. I dislike initially hiding the clubs control, particularly if they are playing Serious 3NT as it seems, although I recognise that I am not in a majority on this. But it escapes me how she can force to slam with no Aces only knowing that partner has strong interest and controls diamonds but not clubs (and also why bother with 6♣ rather than 6♠ if she knows we are missing clubs Ace).
Not that it's easy to bid with other methods. In ours, South will not be able to convince North that diamonds must be a void and will probably just have to raise to slam on seat of pants (or RKCB directly over Non-Serious, which is much the same thing).
#8
Posted Yesterday, 09:15
1S-2NT
3C-6S
2NT=gf in spades
3C=minimum hand
#9
Posted Yesterday, 09:19
mike777, on 2026-March-20, 09:15, said:
1S-2NT
3C-6S
2NT=gf in spades
3C=minimum hand
It appears that south did not have J2nt available
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
"Hysterical Raisins again - this time on the World stage, not just the ACBL" mycroft
#10
Posted Yesterday, 09:31
jillybean, on 2026-March-20, 09:19, said:
If South is willing to bid slam opposite a minimum and despite shortage in his clubs then he can always just jump to slam over the the minimum response to 3S (Non-Serious 3NT or 4S), or bid 4NT RKCB to give the opponents a little more to go on.
#11
Posted Yesterday, 10:40
pescetom, on 2026-March-20, 09:31, said:
Agree, see my comment above, I don't think south knew what he was doing
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
"Hysterical Raisins again - this time on the World stage, not just the ACBL" mycroft
#12
Posted Yesterday, 16:31
jillybean, on 2026-March-20, 09:19, said:
Many players, including me, prefer to show a good, long suit that can provide a source of tricks in a slam. Opener can upgrade hands with a club honor. If responder doesn't have a way to show diamond shortness later in the auction, that can be a problem as well.
#13
Posted Yesterday, 17:14
johnu, on 2026-March-20, 16:31, said:
I agree, there are numerous ways to bid this hand.
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
"Hysterical Raisins again - this time on the World stage, not just the ACBL" mycroft

Help
