BBO Discussion Forums: Nameless bidding problem - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Nameless bidding problem

#1 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2008-July-08, 04:25

Teams, white against red.

A9xx
J10x
J9
Qxxx

(1S) - 2D - (p) - p
(2S) - Dbl - (p) - ??
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#2 User is offline   helene_t 

  • The Abbess
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,366
  • Joined: 2004-April-22
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Interests:History, languages

Posted 2008-July-08, 04:46

If p has the prototypical 1363 then we must be in 3 (at least according to the LOTT) and p would probably bid 3 if I scramble with 2NT. So 3, without great conviction.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
0

#3 User is offline   Sambolino 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 173
  • Joined: 2005-April-08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Belgrade, Serbia

Posted 2008-July-08, 05:01

why is 1363 protopypical and not 1453 or 1354?

i want to play 3c even in moysian because i won't be forced to ruff in hand with longer trumps.

i guess the other question here intended may be "is this worth a game try?"
0

#4 User is offline   FrancesHinden 

  • Limit bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,482
  • Joined: 2004-November-02
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:England
  • Interests:Bridge, classical music, skiing... but I spend more time earning a living than doing any of those

Posted 2008-July-08, 05:21

Sambolino, on Jul 8 2008, 12:01 PM, said:

why is 1363 protopypical and not 1453 or 1354?

Because 1453 or 1354 would have doubled 1S.

I don't play lebensohl in this position (I play 2NT as two places to play, though arguably natural is quite a good meaning) so I just bid 3D.
0

#5 User is offline   skjaeran 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,727
  • Joined: 2006-June-05
  • Location:Oslo, Norway
  • Interests:Bridge, sports, Sci-fi, fantasy

Posted 2008-July-08, 05:37

What do you expect partner to bid with xx Kx AKQxxx AJx?

That's more in line with what I'd expect partner to hold for this bidding - a strong overcall.

I'm bidding 3NT.
Kind regards,
Harald
0

#6 User is offline   Sambolino 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 173
  • Joined: 2005-April-08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Belgrade, Serbia

Posted 2008-July-08, 06:04

FrancesHinden, on Jul 8 2008, 06:21 AM, said:

Sambolino, on Jul 8 2008, 12:01 PM, said:

why is 1363 protopypical and not 1453 or 1354?

Because 1453 or 1354 would have doubled 1S.

I don't play lebensohl in this position (I play 2NT as two places to play, though arguably natural is quite a good meaning) so I just bid 3D.

right, i was rash - although there are some 5431's you'd overcall rather than double
0

#7 User is offline   helene_t 

  • The Abbess
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,366
  • Joined: 2004-April-22
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Interests:History, languages

Posted 2008-July-08, 06:14

Is there a distinction between a good 3 call and a bad 3 call (e.g. the good one direct and the bad one via 2NT?)

An alternative interpretation of 2NT followed by 3 could be hearts+diamond tolerance. Would that be a 5-card hearts (assuming that p's failure to dbl initially denied a 4-card hearts) or would it be a 4-card hearts (assuming that with five hearts we could just bid them now) ?
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
0

#8 User is offline   Codo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,373
  • Joined: 2003-March-15
  • Location:Hamburg, Germany
  • Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball

Posted 2008-July-08, 07:45

Haralds 3 NT is enterprissing, I don`t believe that my partner can deliver 7.5 tricks for his overcall and later double. So I try 2 NT.
Kind Regards

Roland


Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
0

#9 User is offline   andy_h 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,962
  • Joined: 2007-September-14
  • Location:Australia
  • Interests:The Universe, Traveling, Squash, and Scandinavia.

Posted 2008-July-08, 08:15

I like 3D.
- Andy -

We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
0

#10 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2008-July-08, 08:49

helene_t, on Jul 8 2008, 01:14 PM, said:

An alternative interpretation of 2NT followed by 3 could be hearts+diamond tolerance.

That was my immediate assumption, but it's problematic.

If we're going to try to find a heart fit using a "two places to play" 2NT, 2NT-3 has to promise enough hearts for advancer to bid hearts himself. Hence, over 2NT, if overcaller has a 1=3=6=3 shape he has to bid 3. Is that a good idea?
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#11 User is online   mikeh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,348
  • Joined: 2005-June-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada
  • Interests:Bridge, golf, wine (red), cooking, reading eclectically but insatiably, travelling, making bad posts.

Posted 2008-July-08, 09:11

skaeran, on Jul 8 2008, 06:37 AM, said:

What do you expect partner to bid with xx Kx AKQxxx AJx?

That's more in line with what I'd expect partner to hold for this bidding - a strong overcall.

I'm bidding 3NT.

He MIGHT have that holding, but what would you have him do with x Kxx AKxxxx AJx? Pass 2? I can't see how that can be good bridge.

Partner's rarely have magic cards, so I bid 3.
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari
0

#12 User is offline   pclayton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,151
  • Joined: 2003-June-11
  • Location:Southern California

Posted 2008-July-08, 09:15

3 with a smart partner. I don't think 1453 / 1354 is possible - this hand bids 2N over 2. Pard is a huge favorite to hold 1363 here.

2N by me really should be 2/5.
"Phil" on BBO
0

#13 User is offline   nige1 

  • 5-level belongs to me
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,128
  • Joined: 2004-August-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Glasgow Scotland
  • Interests:Poems Computers

Posted 2008-July-08, 11:15

han, on Jul 8 2008, 05:25 AM, said:

Teams, white against red.
A9xx
J10x
J9
Qxxx
(1S) - 2D - (p) - p
(2S) - Dbl - (p) - ??

IMO 2N=10, 3D=9, 3N=8, 3C=6, _P=2.
0

#14 User is offline   skjaeran 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,727
  • Joined: 2006-June-05
  • Location:Oslo, Norway
  • Interests:Bridge, sports, Sci-fi, fantasy

Posted 2008-July-08, 12:40

mikeh, on Jul 8 2008, 05:11 PM, said:

skaeran, on Jul 8 2008, 06:37 AM, said:

What do you expect partner to bid with xx Kx AKQxxx AJx?

That's more in line with what I'd expect partner to hold for this bidding - a strong overcall.

I'm bidding 3NT.

He MIGHT have that holding, but what would you have him do with x Kxx AKxxxx AJx? Pass 2? I can't see how that can be good bridge.

Partner's rarely have magic cards, so I bid 3.

I agree with you on the magic card part, of course.

Actually, I'd bid 2NT if that was natural. But having the agreement that 2NT is never natural, unless it IS, I doubt that's possible.
Kind regards,
Harald
0

#15 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2008-July-08, 14:20

I think 3D is enough, partner is under some pressure to act when he has short spades.
0

#16 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2008-July-08, 17:55

skaeran, on Jul 8 2008, 06:37 AM, said:

What do you expect partner to bid with xx Kx AKQxxx AJx?

That's more in line with what I'd expect partner to hold for this bidding - a strong overcall.

I'm bidding 3NT.

A downside to weak jump overcalls. I play weak jump overcalls, but I keep seeing that occasional problem described on BBF which would be easily solved with intermediate jump overcalls.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0

#17 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2008-July-09, 02:23

Partner had x KQxx AQ10xxx Ax. Opener has all the missing HCP so you make 3NT.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#18 User is offline   benlessard 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,465
  • Joined: 2006-January-07
  • Location:Montreal Canada
  • Interests:All games. i really mean all of them.

Posted 2008-July-09, 05:43

IMO you must have a way to show values on this sequence. You should play 2Nt as scrambling only when there is no possibility of game but when game is possible you should play your favorite lebensohl setup.
From Psych "I mean, Gus and I never see eye-to-eye on work stuff.
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users