BBO Discussion Forums: Lebensohl Woes - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Lebensohl Woes What's the cue?

#21 User is offline   TimG 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,972
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maine, USA

Posted 2008-August-27, 11:16

jdonn, on Aug 26 2008, 07:57 PM, said:

If it went 1NT P to me, and I had to choose between signing off or bidding game, i would sign off.

A simple double dummy simulation:
predeal north SJT954, HKJ842, CT64

    south_shape_ok=shape(south, any 4432 + any 4333 + any 5332 - 5xxx -x5xx)
    south_HCP_ok=hcp(south)<18 && hcp(south)>14
    south_ok=south_shape_ok && south_HCP_ok

condition south_ok
suggests that 4M makes over 50% of the time (and that it doesn't matter whether opener or responder declares the hand).

Bump the NT bid to 16-18 and it goes to over 60%. But, I did not take into account the opening bid so cannot make any statement about how that affects things.
0

#22 User is offline   Echognome 

  • Deipnosophist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,386
  • Joined: 2005-March-22

Posted 2008-August-27, 11:20

Simulation = proof!
"Half the people you know are below average." - Steven Wright
0

#23 User is offline   TimG 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,972
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maine, USA

Posted 2008-August-27, 13:36

Echognome, on Aug 27 2008, 12:20 PM, said:

Simulation = proof!

Nope. It is what it is, but it ain't proof. Hope I didn't imply it was.
0

#24 User is offline   Lobowolf 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,030
  • Joined: 2008-August-08
  • Interests:Attorney, writer, entertainer.<br><br>Great close-up magicians we have known: Shoot Ogawa, Whit Haydn, Bill Malone, David Williamson, Dai Vernon, Michael Skinner, Jay Sankey, Brian Gillis, Eddie Fechter, Simon Lovell, Carl Andrews.

Posted 2008-August-27, 13:38

TimG, on Aug 27 2008, 02:36 PM, said:

Echognome, on Aug 27 2008, 12:20 PM, said:

Simulation = proof!

Nope. It is what it is, but it ain't proof. Hope I didn't imply it was.

Evidence.
1. LSAT tutor for rent.

Call me Desdinova...Eternal Light

C. It's the nexus of the crisis and the origin of storms.

IV: ace 333: pot should be game, idk

e: "Maybe God remembered how cute you were as a carrot."
0

#25 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2008-August-27, 15:18

pclayton, on Aug 27 2008, 10:25 AM, said:

Jlall, on Aug 26 2008, 07:25 PM, said:

Quote

How are we going to play in our lesser trump fit? Surely I'm at least 5-4 for this action (and probably 5-5).


Think about it! I'm sure you can figure it out!

Sorry, the imagination meter doesn't go this high. Please explain.

Come on....... If you bid 3S and partner has 3 spades and 4 hearts what will partner bid?
0

#26 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2008-August-27, 15:25

TimG, on Aug 27 2008, 12:16 PM, said:

jdonn, on Aug 26 2008, 07:57 PM, said:

If it went 1NT P to me, and I had to choose between signing off or bidding game, i would sign off.

A simple double dummy simulation:
predeal north SJT954, HKJ842, CT64

    south_shape_ok=shape(south, any 4432 + any 4333 + any 5332 - 5xxx -x5xx)
    south_HCP_ok=hcp(south)<18 && hcp(south)>14
    south_ok=south_shape_ok && south_HCP_ok

condition south_ok
suggests that 4M makes over 50% of the time (and that it doesn't matter whether opener or responder declares the hand).

Bump the NT bid to 16-18 and it goes to over 60%. But, I did not take into account the opening bid so cannot make any statement about how that affects things.

Some comments:

1) For an overcall I think most people would overcall almost all 18s and would not overcall with a lot of 15s, but I understand that 15 is far more likely to come up than 18 so maybe 15 is still more likely. Anyways, I think that 15-17 is not a good range for an overcall.

2) Your simulation probably includes a lot of hands that are takeout doubles of 1C which will favor the likelihood of 4M being cold. For instance I think few specifically 4432 hands would overcall 1N.

3) I think the opening 1C bid on your left and the diamond bid on your right will definitely increase your chances of making 4M. Any spade and club finesses will likely be on, and the likelihood of massive diamond wastage with partner is probably decreased.

4) It is true that you can still back into game sometimes by bidding 2S, with 4 spades and a nice looking hand partner will raise to 3S, and sometimes someone will bid 3D and when you bid 3H partner can bid 4H with 4 hearts and a nice looking hand. I guess this is the main argument for people who just bid 2S despite the high likelihood of a game making. I still think that there is too high of a chance to miss a vul game to go for this plan.
0

#27 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2008-August-27, 15:36

jlall you misunderstood :) I had posted that if 1NT was opened I consider the hand closer to a signoff than a gf (as opposed to that I would gf on the actual auction), and that's what he was testing.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#28 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2008-August-27, 15:44

jdonn, on Aug 27 2008, 04:36 PM, said:

jlall you misunderstood :( I had posted that if 1NT was opened I consider the hand closer to a signoff than a gf (as opposed to that I would gf on the actual auction), and that's what he was testing.

ok, just modifying it for the actual situation! I guess he could run a new simulation if he wanted but that seems like work :)
0

#29 User is offline   TimG 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,972
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maine, USA

Posted 2008-August-27, 15:47

Jlall, on Aug 27 2008, 04:25 PM, said:

TimG, on Aug 27 2008, 12:16 PM, said:

jdonn, on Aug 26 2008, 07:57 PM, said:

If it went 1NT P to me, and I had to choose between signing off or bidding game, i would sign off.

1) For an overcall I think most people would overcall almost all 18s and would not overcall with a lot of 15s, but I understand that 15 is far more likely to come up than 18 so maybe 15 is still more likely. Anyways, I think that 15-17 is not a good range for an overcall.

I used 15-17 because I meant to address jdonn's opinion regarding 1N-P to him. I agree that it is not a good range for an overcall.

I included the 16-18 range because that is more likely for an overcall, but was careful to add that I did not take into account the opening bid, and made no claims as to how the opening bid would affect things. That's left for better players...like Justin.
0

#30 User is offline   skjaeran 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,727
  • Joined: 2006-June-05
  • Location:Oslo, Norway
  • Interests:Bridge, sports, Sci-fi, fantasy

Posted 2008-August-28, 14:30

3 followed by raising 3M to game or 4 over 3NT.
Expect 1NT to be 15-18, and partner is sitting over opener. Can't just invite on this.
Kind regards,
Harald
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

5 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 5 guests, 0 anonymous users