IMPs
An eight-count
#1
Posted 2011-November-13, 01:25
IMPs
#4
Posted 2011-November-13, 02:31
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#5
Posted 2011-November-13, 02:59
Never tell the same lie twice. - Elim Garek on the real moral of "The boy who cried wolf"
#6
Posted 2011-November-13, 03:02
edit: I guess that would be "yesterday." argh.
#7
Posted 2011-November-13, 03:48
#9
Posted 2011-November-13, 06:35
Short of 15 hcp?
I'd prefer that, but 2S without options.
#10
Posted 2011-November-13, 06:49
George Carlin
#11
Posted 2011-November-13, 07:05
-P.J. Painter.
#12
Posted 2011-November-13, 08:16
We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
#13
Posted 2011-November-13, 12:23
JLOGIC, on 2011-November-13, 03:02, said:
edit: I guess that would be "yesterday." argh.
Sounds familiar. Yesterday I had K109xx Kx xx Axxx all red, RHO opened 2D multi on my right, I passed, LHO bid 3H pass/correct, all pass, and we were cold for 4S as well.
- hrothgar
#15
Posted 2011-November-15, 04:30
3♦ was forcing, but we weren't sure how far. 3♥ was an attempt to get to 3NT, but maybe 4♣ would have been better.
Partner had x KQx AKQJxxxx K, so it looked like we'd stumbled into a makeable contract. Then they led a spade and it went down. Getting to slam on these cards isn't necessarily bad, though 6♦ would have had better chances. In 6♦, a heart lead is more likely, and on a spade lead you still make if opener has ♣QJ.
Things weren't helped by not knowing what was forcing, but another problem was having such a wide range for 2♠. We're now considering playing (2♥) 3♥ as a weakish two-suiter. I don't remember ever bidding it as a stop-ask, so I don't think there's much loss.
Another possibility with this hand-type is to pass, then double 3♥ or 4♥ if they bid that. (Fluffy's suggestion of pass followed by 4♠ seems too committal to me, and anyway I think that shows a weak one-suiter.) A few years ago I posted a poll about a similar sequence, but there wasn't much support for the idea that a delayed double showed a two-suiter.
#16
Posted 2011-November-15, 04:41
Anyway, the wide range wasn't the problem. Put overcaller on AJTxx xx x AJxxx (a pretty obvious 2S) and it's the same thing. Just congratulate opps for finding the killing lead.
In any case I quite disagree with your side's auction (dont take this personally lol). 3H seems like an overbid. Just bid 3S (or maybe 4C if that doesn't show extras). You don't want to encourage pard to a slam and 3H, no matter how you define it, will probably always be undefined as to range. Pard's 6NT also looks reckless... I mean, if you had had AKQxx JTx x xxxx 6NT would gonna look REAL silly on a club lead while 6D is a lay-down.
Finally, to play (2H)-3H as a weak 2-suiter might be quite unsound. To be on the safe side you'd need like a 6-5, greatly reducing the odds it will come up. Either that or overcall at the 3 level on weak hands, which is also debateable.
#17
Posted 2011-November-15, 04:42
gnasher, on 2011-November-15, 04:30, said:
3♦ was forcing, but we weren't sure how far. 3♥ was an attempt to get to 3NT, but maybe 4♣ would have been better.
I think the problem is the 3♥ call. Partner thought you were trying to get to 3NT and he had enough extraa to want to play 6NT. You don't have enough values to want to get to 3NT. I'd have bid 3♠ and left furthre moves to partner (probably 3NT from him which should show interest in contracts beyond 3NT - else he wouldn't have bid 3♦ first). If we have a club fit and partner raises us to 4♠ on Hx, it's not all bad. We might even have play!
#18
Posted 2011-November-15, 05:09
whereagles, on 2011-November-15, 04:41, said:
Why should I take it personally? I posted this hand because I wanted to hear people's opinions.
Quote
I hope I won't be accused of nitpicking by saying this, but in 6♦ we seem likely to lose two aces and at least one heart ruff.
#19
Posted 2011-November-15, 05:51
The 6NT bidder to a stab. Sometimes you hit, sometimes you miss. I don't think it is worth changing the system for such hands.
3H looks right to me.
- hrothgar