Help
Dealer: East / MPs / All white
Pd (North) opens 1♦ in 4th Seat.
Op (East) bids 1♠.
What is your bid with:
♣ 1098
♦ 10752
♥ QJ87
♠ A2
What is your 2nd bid after West raises to 2♠ and Pd passes?
Simple problem?
#1
- Group: Members
- Posts: 22
- Joined: 2009-November-24
- Gender:Male
- Interests:Piano, Tennis, Jogging
Posted 2011-November-24, 02:59
Love values its object, hate devalues it. Love exudes an inner worth, hate exudes worthlessness. Love inspires, hate dehumanizes.
#2
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 466
- Joined: 2010-August-31
- Gender:Female
- Location:Los Angeles
Posted 2011-November-24, 03:17
Bussy, on 2011-November-24, 02:59, said:
Dealer: East / MPs / All white
Pd (North) opens 1♦ in 4th Seat.
Op (East) bids 1♠.
What is your bid with:
♣ 1098
♦ 10752
♥ QJ87
♠ A2
What is your 2nd bid after West raises to 2♠ and Pd passes?
Pd (North) opens 1♦ in 4th Seat.
Op (East) bids 1♠.
What is your bid with:
♣ 1098
♦ 10752
♥ QJ87
♠ A2
What is your 2nd bid after West raises to 2♠ and Pd passes?
Did you reverse the order of the hand or just the symbols?
In both cases - I would double, and correct to ♦ if partner bids ♣. If he bids hearts or NT I am happy.
Yehudit Hasin
"But I don't want to go among mad people," Alice remarked.
"Oh, you can't help that," said the Cat: "we're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad."
"How do you know I'm mad?" said Alice.
"You must be," said the Cat, "or you wouldn't have come here."
"But I don't want to go among mad people," Alice remarked.
"Oh, you can't help that," said the Cat: "we're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad."
"How do you know I'm mad?" said Alice.
"You must be," said the Cat, "or you wouldn't have come here."
#3
- Group: Members
- Posts: 22
- Joined: 2009-November-24
- Gender:Male
- Interests:Piano, Tennis, Jogging
Posted 2011-November-24, 03:31
Oh sorry, right. I have reversed the order.
♠ A2
♥ QJ87
♦ 10752
♣ 1098
Question 2)
Bidding goes:
East - South - West - North
Pass - Pass - Pass - 1♦
1♠ - (????) - 2♠ - Pass
Pass - ??
♠ A2
♥ QJ87
♦ 10752
♣ 1098
Question 2)
Bidding goes:
East - South - West - North
Pass - Pass - Pass - 1♦
1♠ - (????) - 2♠ - Pass
Pass - ??
This post has been edited by Bussy: 2011-November-24, 03:38
Love values its object, hate devalues it. Love exudes an inner worth, hate exudes worthlessness. Love inspires, hate dehumanizes.
#4
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 584
- Joined: 2008-November-27
Posted 2011-November-24, 03:38
I would double , and compete with 3♦ over their 2♠
#5
- 2011 Poster of The Year winner
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 6,002
- Joined: 2010-July-08
- Gender:Male
Posted 2011-November-24, 03:43
X then 3D. 3D is pretty sick but...MP w/w, this is how we roll!
blogging at http://www.justinlall.com
#6
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 466
- Joined: 2010-August-31
- Gender:Female
- Location:Los Angeles
Posted 2011-November-24, 03:53
Bussy, on 2011-November-24, 03:31, said:
East - South - West - North
Pass - Pass - Pass - 1♦
1♠ - (????) - 2♠ - Pass
Pass - ??
3♦, and hope we dont go for -2 doubled....I see no reason to think that 2♠ is not making, so as long as we loose less than 110 it would be good.
Yehudit Hasin
"But I don't want to go among mad people," Alice remarked.
"Oh, you can't help that," said the Cat: "we're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad."
"How do you know I'm mad?" said Alice.
"You must be," said the Cat, "or you wouldn't have come here."
"But I don't want to go among mad people," Alice remarked.
"Oh, you can't help that," said the Cat: "we're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad."
"How do you know I'm mad?" said Alice.
"You must be," said the Cat, "or you wouldn't have come here."
#8
- Andy Bowles
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 11,993
- Joined: 2007-May-03
- Gender:Male
- Location:London, UK
Posted 2011-November-24, 08:15
I wouldn't be worried about being doubled in 3♦. The main problem is that the 3♦ bid has a very wide range - from this hand (or worse) all the way up to an 11-count. As usual, I think transfers are the answer - 2NT showing clubs, 3♣ showing diamonds weak or game-forcing, 3♦ natural invitational.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
#9
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 14,065
- Joined: 2009-July-13
- Location:England
Posted 2011-November-24, 08:31
gnasher, on 2011-November-24, 08:15, said:
I wouldn't be worried about being doubled in 3♦. The main problem is that the 3♦ bid has a very wide range - from this hand (or worse) all the way up to an 11-count. As usual, I think transfers are the answer - 2NT showing clubs, 3♣ showing diamonds weak or game-forcing, 3♦ natural invitational.
I wouldn't have this problem with this sequence (which I'd also adopt) as an initial 2♦ would be inverted not denying 4M 10+, so I'm limited to 9.
#10
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 10,678
- Joined: 2006-May-18
- Gender:Not Telling
Posted 2011-November-24, 08:36
Cyberyeti, on 2011-November-24, 08:31, said:
I wouldn't have this problem with this sequence (which I'd also adopt) as an initial 2♦ would be inverted not denying 4M 10+, so I'm limited to 9.
Your opening 1D bid also promises 4+. Presumably the inverted 2D response also guarantees an 8 card fit?
(-: Zel :-)
#11
- Group: Members
- Posts: 22
- Joined: 2009-November-24
- Gender:Male
- Interests:Piano, Tennis, Jogging
Posted 2011-November-24, 09:14
gnasher, on 2011-November-24, 08:15, said:
I wouldn't be worried about being doubled in 3♦. The main problem is that the 3♦ bid has a very wide range - from this hand (or worse) all the way up to an 11-count. As usual, I think transfers are the answer - 2NT showing clubs, 3♣ showing diamonds weak or game-forcing, 3♦ natural invitational.
That is the point! Yesterday I've doubled first & bidden 3♦ over 2♠. My partner (with a nice 14 HCP hand / also King of ♠) tried 3NT... - doubled/ -2. "I thought you had 10/11 points p..."
I like your Lebensohl-like sequence...
Love values its object, hate devalues it. Love exudes an inner worth, hate exudes worthlessness. Love inspires, hate dehumanizes.
#12
- Andy Bowles
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 11,993
- Joined: 2007-May-03
- Gender:Male
- Location:London, UK
Posted 2011-November-24, 11:10
Cyberyeti, on 2011-November-24, 08:31, said:
I wouldn't have this problem with this sequence (which I'd also adopt) as an initial 2♦ would be inverted not denying 4M 10+, so I'm limited to 9.
It must be fun trying to cope with sequences like 1♦ (1♠) 2♦ (3♠).
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
#13
- mmm Duvel
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 10,728
- Joined: 2003-July-30
- Gender:Male
- Location:Belgium
- Interests:Duvel, Whisky
Posted 2011-November-24, 13:12
Dbl and 3♦ for me.
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
#14
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 2,207
- Joined: 2009-April-26
- Gender:Male
- Location:Wellington, NZ
Posted 2011-November-24, 13:16
I would just raise to 2♦ on the first round. The downside is when we make 110 in diamonds instead of 140 in hearts. But once I have raised, it will be much easier for partner to make the right decision about whether to compete further.
#15
- 5-level belongs to me
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 9,128
- Joined: 2004-August-30
- Gender:Male
- Location:Glasgow Scotland
- Interests:Poems Computers
Posted 2011-November-24, 18:24
Bussy, on 2011-November-24, 03:31, said:
♠ A2 ♥ QJ87 ♦ 10752 ♣ 1098
(Pass) - Pass - (Pass) - 1♦
(1♠) - ?1 - (2♠) - Pass
(Pass) - ?2
(Pass) - Pass - (Pass) - 1♦
(1♠) - ?1 - (2♠) - Pass
(Pass) - ?2
- 2♦ = 10, Double = 9, 3♦ = 6. This hand is worth only one bid.
- If you doubled 1♠, then 3♦ = 10, Pass = 9. Otherwise pass = 10.
#16
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 14,065
- Joined: 2009-July-13
- Location:England
Posted 2011-November-24, 19:07
gnasher, on 2011-November-24, 11:10, said:
It must be fun trying to cope with sequences like 1♦ (1♠) 2♦ (3♠).
Actually no problem at all here with the 4th seat 1♦, can be more of a problem with the first seat version but curiously has never actually caused us a problem as far as I can remember in the 15 odd years we've played this.
#17
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 4,531
- Joined: 2005-October-09
- Location:Netherlands
Posted 2011-November-25, 12:14
Cyberyeti, on 2011-November-24, 19:07, said:
gnasher, on 2011-November-24, 11:10, said:
It must be fun trying to cope with sequences like 1♦ (1♠) 2♦ (3♠).
Actually no problem at all here with the 4th seat 1♦, can be more of a problem with the first seat version but curiously has never actually caused us a problem as far as I can remember in the 15 odd years we've played this.
You have never missed a cold 4♥ bidding like this? Maybe you have played this for 15 years, but how many boards do you play per year?
Rik
I want my opponents to leave my table with a smile on their face and without matchpoints on their score card - in that order.
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not “Eureka!” (I found it!), but “That’s funny…” – Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not “Eureka!” (I found it!), but “That’s funny…” – Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg
#18
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 14,065
- Joined: 2009-July-13
- Location:England
Posted 2011-November-25, 14:11
Trinidad, on 2011-November-25, 12:14, said:
You have never missed a cold 4♥ bidding like this? Maybe you have played this for 15 years, but how many boards do you play per year?
Rik
Rik
Not as many as I used to but enough, X from either side still shows hearts for us.
#19
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 100
- Joined: 2004-March-18
Posted 2011-November-25, 22:37
There are 4 bids over 1♠, neg x, 1nt and 2♦ (if not inverted) and 3♦ if playing inverted (a bit insane)..I give a neg x 10, as it seems the most sensible and describes my holding since we may be missing a heart fit. I give NT a 5 and 2♦a 7, but it is also not so good for the same reason...I pass 2♠...why am I competing with 3 ♦at IMPs??....3♦ promises a lot more than a balanced 7 count..and do I really want go for 300? ESPECIALLY when pard passes 2♠
#20
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 12,029
- Joined: 2009-February-21
- Gender:Male
- Location:St. George, UT
Posted 2011-November-25, 23:24
I would be competing with 3D and not worried that partner will think I am inviting game.
Second double=more strength
2NT=more distribution, hearts and clubs.
3D=this hand.
We already know pard has a good 13-14, and 4 diamonds (at least). She opened the bidding in 4th chair and doesn't have spades; she won't restate that fact by bidding again over 3D.
Second double=more strength
2NT=more distribution, hearts and clubs.
3D=this hand.
We already know pard has a good 13-14, and 4 diamonds (at least). She opened the bidding in 4th chair and doesn't have spades; she won't restate that fact by bidding again over 3D.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)