BBO Discussion Forums: response after pd's balancing 1S - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

response after pd's balancing 1S Your call

Poll: your call (43 member(s) have cast votes)

What call do you make

  1. 2D (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  2. 2H (20 votes [46.51%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 46.51%

  3. 2S (22 votes [51.16%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 51.16%

  4. 2NT (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  5. 3C (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  6. something else (1 votes [2.33%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 2.33%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#21 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2011-December-15, 09:44

View Postgordontd, on 2011-December-15, 09:41, said:

Would you consider this hand good enough to UCB in response to a debased second-seat one-level overcall?

Yes, though I realise that this is a bit inconsistent.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#22 User is offline   gordontd 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,485
  • Joined: 2009-July-14
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London

Posted 2011-December-15, 10:00

View Postgnasher, on 2011-December-15, 09:44, said:

Yes, though I realise that this is a bit inconsistent.

I expect that what we might last week have considered to be inconsistency, this week we see as the superior judgement of a Gold Cup winner :)
Gordon Rainsford
London UK
0

#23 User is offline   mfa1010 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 796
  • Joined: 2010-October-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Copenhagen, Denmark

Posted 2011-December-15, 10:02

View Postgnasher, on 2011-December-15, 08:22, said:

I think that second-seat overcalls have been so debased that there's no difference between a second-seat overcall and a fourth-seat overcall, certainly at the one-level. Hence I've stopped lending and borrowing kings.

I agree.
Having kings is a luxury when it comes to one-level overcalls. :)
Michael Askgaard
0

#24 User is offline   aguahombre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,029
  • Joined: 2009-February-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St. George, UT

Posted 2011-December-15, 10:18

View Postmfa1010, on 2011-December-15, 10:02, said:

Having kings is a luxury when it comes to one-level overcalls. :)

And having somewhere near t/o distribution has become a luxury when it comes to t/o doubles, so probably the borrowing concept should be dead in today's "balance" theory.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
0

#25 User is offline   Phil 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,092
  • Joined: 2008-December-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:North Texas, USA
  • Interests:Mountain Biking

Posted 2011-December-15, 11:08

View Postgnasher, on 2011-December-15, 09:44, said:

Yes, though I realise that this is a bit inconsistent.


Why? It just means you are rejecting partners game overtures more frequently. Regardless of overcalling styles its important to differentiate between a simple raise and a limit raise.

Now if you choose to start debasing cue bids... :)
Hi y'all!

Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
0

#26 User is offline   JLOGIC 

  • 2011 Poster of The Year winner
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,002
  • Joined: 2010-July-08
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2011-December-15, 15:22

Agree with pretty much everything Phil has said in this thread
blogging at http://www.justinlall.com
0
  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

3 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users