Edit: I also don't know why the 1♦ bid does not include an explanation; this seemed to be happening a lot yesterday.
Page 1 of 1
1 instead of 2
#1
Posted 2012-June-18, 12:29
Why doesn't North correct to 3♦? Clearly, 2♦ shows more than 4 diamonds.
Edit: I also don't know why the 1♦ bid does not include an explanation; this seemed to be happening a lot yesterday.
Edit: I also don't know why the 1♦ bid does not include an explanation; this seemed to be happening a lot yesterday.
#2
Posted 2012-June-18, 16:42
Presumably GIB operates under the "no double, no trouble" maxim.
(Yes, from my experience this sort of bidding behavior - or non-behavior - is an issue with the bot.)
(Yes, from my experience this sort of bidding behavior - or non-behavior - is an issue with the bot.)
#3
Posted 2012-June-19, 23:52
Similarly, I hope North would not bid this 4♣ on a 4-card suit, despite the description:
#4
Posted 2012-June-20, 00:04
Similarly, I hope North would not bid this 4♥ on a 4-card suit, despite the description:
Page 1 of 1