Case 1:
1S - 1NTF
3S - 4C = ??
Case 2:
1S - 1NTF
4S - 5C = ??
Page 1 of 1
Cue or Suit ? 2/1 context
#1
Posted 2012-August-18, 02:17
Don Stenmark
TWOferBRIDGE
"imo by far in bridge the least understood concept is how to bid over a jump-shift
( 1M-1NT!-3m-?? )." ....Justin Lall
" Did someone mention relays? " .... Zelandakh
K-Rex to Mikeh : " Sometimes you drive me nuts " .
TWOferBRIDGE
"imo by far in bridge the least understood concept is how to bid over a jump-shift
( 1M-1NT!-3m-?? )." ....Justin Lall
" Did someone mention relays? " .... Zelandakh
K-Rex to Mikeh : " Sometimes you drive me nuts " .
#2
Posted 2012-August-18, 02:45
both agree spades...
You cant play clubs!
You can never never play clubs.....
You cant play clubs!
You can never never play clubs.....
#3
Posted 2012-August-18, 07:38
Agree. If the bid had been a different suit these bids might be natural, but not here.
#5
Posted 2012-August-18, 13:34
Siegmund, on 2012-August-18, 12:32, said:
The first feels like a cuebid. The second feels like DNE.
DNE = ??
Don Stenmark
TWOferBRIDGE
"imo by far in bridge the least understood concept is how to bid over a jump-shift
( 1M-1NT!-3m-?? )." ....Justin Lall
" Did someone mention relays? " .... Zelandakh
K-Rex to Mikeh : " Sometimes you drive me nuts " .
TWOferBRIDGE
"imo by far in bridge the least understood concept is how to bid over a jump-shift
( 1M-1NT!-3m-?? )." ....Justin Lall
" Did someone mention relays? " .... Zelandakh
K-Rex to Mikeh : " Sometimes you drive me nuts " .
#6
Posted 2012-August-19, 20:11
1♠ then 3/4♠ sets spades as trump, therefore cuebid. However if it had been a new suit, 1♠ 1NT 3♦ for instance, you have to make an agreement on what 4♣ is
I ♦ Transfers
#7
Posted 2012-August-20, 21:02
DNE = Does Not Exist.
Sorry, thought it was a common usage for bids that are deliberately left undefined in a system.
If opener has a hand just a little bit better than an opening 4S preempt, and responder only had enough for 1NT, there should be no such thing as a hand where he wants to take a second call.
Sorry, thought it was a common usage for bids that are deliberately left undefined in a system.
If opener has a hand just a little bit better than an opening 4S preempt, and responder only had enough for 1NT, there should be no such thing as a hand where he wants to take a second call.
#8
Posted 2012-August-21, 04:54
Both cue. For me 3♠ demands a cue if I have one, but as we bid 1st or 2nd round controls, a splinter is a cue.
1♠ 1NT 4♠ itself is DNE for me, so as responder I would think maybe he is just short of a 2♣, kicking himself about opening 1♠, and forgetting about the existence of the 3♠. (This sort of thing happens in my partnerships.) So with a pretty good 1NT I cue.
1♠ 1NT 4♠ itself is DNE for me, so as responder I would think maybe he is just short of a 2♣, kicking himself about opening 1♠, and forgetting about the existence of the 3♠. (This sort of thing happens in my partnerships.) So with a pretty good 1NT I cue.
Page 1 of 1