Overbidders Anonymous
#1
Posted 2012-September-05, 14:27
Rate my overbids on a scale from 0 to 5, with 0 being "I'd bid that myself in serious competition" to 5 being "Those cards with the letters on them, those are the good ones."
Also, upgrade each hand (by adding/improving high cards to the hand) to give a normal minimum for each action, if you please.
Everything at IMPs.
1. 1st seat R/W. Qxxx xx AK8xx Jx. P P P 1S; 2D
2. 1st seat W/R. AJx x Q109xx AKJx. 1D 1S P 2H; X
3. 3rd seat R/W. KJ10x 10xxx KQx Kx. 1S P 2N P; 3H X 4N
4. 3rd seat W/W. Jxx KJ10xx KQJx x. P 1C 1H 3C; 3H 4C 4H
5. 1st seat W/R. Kx AK10xx KQJ xxx. 1N - diamond transfer (no invite possible) - 3N.
#2
Posted 2012-September-05, 14:59
0...2. 1st seat W/R. AJx x Q109xx AKJx. 1D 1S P 2H; X
0...3. 3rd seat R/W. KJ10x 10xxx KQx Kx. 1S P 2N P; 3H X 4N
0...4. 3rd seat W/W. Jxx KJ10xx KQJx x. P 1C 1H 3C; 3H 4C 4H
5...5. 1st seat W/R. Kx AK10xx KQJ xxx. 1N - diamond transfer (no invite possible) - 3N.
I may be too old-fashioned, but when I open 1N, partner is in charge; if he transfers me to diamonds I accept the transfer. If you're going to feel the need to say "but I have more than a 1NT opener", don't open 1NT in the first place.
#3
Posted 2012-September-05, 15:36
semeai, on 2012-September-05, 14:27, said:
2. 1st seat W/R. AJx x Q109xx AKJx. 1D 1S P 2H; X
3. 3rd seat R/W. KJ10x 10xxx KQx Kx. 1S P 2N P; 3H X 4N
4. 3rd seat W/W. Jxx KJ10xx KQJx x. P 1C 1H 3C; 3H 4C 4H
5. 1st seat W/R. Kx AK10xx KQJ xxx. 1N - diamond transfer (no invite possible) - 3N.
1). This is about a three imo. You are a passed hand, so its not so much a points issue, its just that overcalling with Qxxx in rho's suit often indicates that you are walking into a misfit, and there is no compensating shape to make the risk worthwhile.
2) This is fine basically. Sure maybe you should wait to see if the auction dies, but you could still easily have a game or a good sacrifice in clubs. You won't look smart passing if it goes 4S p p back to you, and partner had x xxxx Kx Qxxxxx or something. Game in a minor isn't even out of the question at this point imo. I also have a lot of sympathy for passing here, you could also be putting your head into the alligators jaws.
3) Is this showing extras with a stiff heart? If it is it looks routine to bid keycard. AQxxx x Axxx Qxx and you are totally cold, and that doesnt even have extras. Ill give it a 0.
4) I think its right to pass, but game could be making. Make this a 3.
5) I don't like this bid, could I not underbreak? 1N-2N-3c expresses the hand well. The idea is fine though, you just need a better way to show a hand that is eager to accept without going for a bucked opposite seven low diamonds and out.
#4
Posted 2012-September-05, 16:40
2. a 1, with the ace of diamonds instead of the ace of spades, I would rate it a zero.
3. a 5. Why do you hurry for KCs? I would pass and let partner XX with the ace or bid another control without it. He is still more or less unlimited, isn't he?
4. A 3 Yes, I have the stiff, but I have not so much extra offense that I need to bid now.
5. A 5 I should change my methods to be able to show such a great support and still be able to play in 3 Diamonds. If this is not possible, I would not breech partnership discipline.
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#5
Posted 2012-September-05, 17:14
semeai, on 2012-September-05, 14:27, said:
Rate my overbids on a scale from 0 to 5, with 0 being "I'd bid that myself in serious competition" to 5 being "Those cards with the letters on them, those are the good ones."
Also, upgrade each hand (by adding/improving high cards to the hand) to give a normal minimum for each action, if you please.
Everything at IMPs.
1. 1st seat R/W. Qxxx xx AK8xx Jx. P P P 1S; 2D
2. 1st seat W/R. AJx x Q109xx AKJx. 1D 1S P 2H; X
3. 3rd seat R/W. KJ10x 10xxx KQx Kx. 1S P 2N P; 3H X 4N
4. 3rd seat W/W. Jxx KJ10xx KQJx x. P 1C 1H 3C; 3H 4C 4H
5. 1st seat W/R. Kx AK10xx KQJ xxx. 1N - diamond transfer (no invite possible) - 3N.
1. (1) I'd bid that many times at the club, or with a known to be timid partner, or when I feel a slight need to swing. In serious competition, upgrade the J to a K, or move the Q anywhere else.
2. (0) (Okay - maybe not when ahead in knockout teams.)
3. (5) assuming 4S is fast arrival and 3S (or pass) suggests slam is possible opposite a perfect hand with not much extras.
4. (0-3) depending on agreements. If RHO definitely has 10+ and partner could have nothing more than Qxxx of hearts, it's a (3). If RHO might have no more than 5 clubs to the KJ and partner has at least a somewhat useful 6 count, it's a (0). But in any case, 4D is a better bid because it helps partner judge a sacrifice to 5H if necessary.
5. (2) There are not completely unlikely 0 point hands partner could have that make 4D, and he or she should be taking me out to 4D on a 0 count. But I'd prefer to have a club stopper myself; with this hand, you're still going down in 3N when partner has Axxxxxx of diamonds and a random Q.
#6
Posted 2012-September-05, 17:59
#7
Posted 2012-September-05, 23:55
phil_20686, on 2012-September-05, 15:36, said:
Totally cold for 5S?
To me the question in each of the problems is not "how aggressive is this", but "how good is this". Jumping to keycards on this hand is just bad bridge.
- hrothgar
#8
Posted 2012-September-06, 00:35
1. The opponents bid hearts and I was off the hook. It seems a pretty bad bid, with only moderate upside and large not infrequent downside. Let's say a 4.
2. I was least certain about this hand. Partner was 2-3 (something like xxxx J9xx xx xxx) in the minors and pulled to 3C, was doubled, he ran to 3D, and they went back to hearts and let us off the hook. Partner rates to have at most 3 hearts so they likely have a 9 card fit (not true on the actual hand) and acting can find a nice fit, but maybe I'm too weak with two live opponents. I guess I'l say 2.
3. We ended up in 5, making (partner had 2+Q). The logic of course was that all I cared about now was the Aces and Queen of trump. The bid was just undisciplined, though: passing must be correct. This gives me a shot to stop low if partner is very unenthusiastic as well as a shot at finding out about a void.
I'll agree mostly with Han that the problem was that it was poor to do instead of my hand being too weak, but notice that with KJ10x Axxx KQx Kx it seems fine to just bid keycard (solves the strength and void problems simulatenously).
4. This was just silly. My hand is weak and I don't actually expect to make and they're not in game. I didn't bid 4D because I didn't want to help them decide whether to bid 5C and didn't think we were going to 5H (not sure about this theory). They bid 5C (wouldn't have made) and partner went to 5H, doubled down 2; diamonds were 4 - 1 - 4 around the table (i.e. 1 for partner). Let's say a 3.
5. This did make when partner showed up with Ace sixth and a club stop, obviously a super max. Not having the superaccept possibility was unideal, sure. The theory of course was for partner to have ♦A and the opponents to lead spades and not switch to clubs, which is hoping for a lot in general. This one, like #3, is not an overbid but is just bad.
#9
Posted 2012-September-06, 01:05
Sorry, but giving hand 1 a rating of 4 is a real overbid. This is truly awful. Even 5 is an overbid.
Hand 5 I would rate as a 4.
#10
Posted 2012-September-06, 01:19
the hog, on 2012-September-06, 01:05, said:
Sorry, but giving hand 1 a rating of 4 is a real overbid. This is truly awful. Even 5 is an overbid.
Hand 5 I would rate as a 4.
I'm known for understatement. You appear to have a penchant for overstatement. I'm not so sure we think all that differently about this hand.
But really, here I am offering up for criticism some hands I specifically did something stupid on, from a quick online game. You might be a bit more courteous in your disapproval. "Truly awful" I don't mind. I asked for opinions. The four ?'s and the bold? That seems uncalled for.
#11
Posted 2012-September-06, 01:25
the hog, on 2012-September-06, 01:05, said:
Sorry, but giving hand 1 a rating of 4 is a real overbid. This is truly awful. Even 5 is an overbid.
Hand 5 I would rate as a 4.
semeai, on 2012-September-06, 01:19, said:
But really, here I am offering up for criticism some hands I specifically did something stupid on, from a quick online game. You might be a bit more courteous in your disapproval. "Truly awful" I don't mind. I asked for opinions. The four ?'s and the bold? That seems uncalled for.
To bring the discussion back to bridge, what's the least upgrade to that hand you'd be comfortable overcalling on at unfavorable at imps?
#12
Posted 2012-September-06, 01:50
semeai, on 2012-September-06, 01:25, said:
Seriously, I don't think my emphasis is rude at all The bid is so poor I would probably not play again with someone who made it. What does it gain? You have removed 2C from the opps and that is it. Maybe you have indicated a lead, but you might well be on lead anyway. You have also given them a negative double.
What can it cost? At worst you make 2 tricks and the opps have a game only on. (I agree that that is unlikely). 4 off is certainly a possibility.
To answer your question. Both pd and I are passed hands, so there are very few hands on which I would bid 2D here. Playing a weak 2D, there are no hands on which I would bid 2D. Not playing a weak 2 in Ds, I would bid 2D on AKJxxx or AQJxxx and an outside card.
A freakish 2 suiter where I passed for tactical reasons on the first round might be a more likely possibility
#13
Posted 2012-September-06, 01:55
Anyway, back to bridge: AS Phil pointed out, chances are big that you have a misfit and in this case, you better have a good suit on your own. I would like to hold at least AKJ8xxx, but if I would wait for perfect hands to overcall, I would not overcall enough. So given your terrible spade holding, I would try 2 Clubs with AKJxxx. If I had the majors switched, I had tried 1 NT, which hopefully shows this kind of hand as a passed hand.
With xx,Jx,AK8xx,Qxxx I may had overcalled 2 ♦. This is still very ugly, but it could be right to get the lead in before they reach their best contract.
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#14
Posted 2012-September-06, 06:28
1. 1st seat R/W. Qxxx xx AK8xx Jx. P P P 1S; 2D --> 5 ; asking for trouble
2. 1st seat W/R. AJx x Q109xx AKJx. 1D 1S P 2H; X --> 0 ; acceptable if it is understood to show such a hand.
3. 3rd seat R/W. KJ10x 10xxx KQx Kx. 1S P 2N P; 3H X 4N --> 5 ; without an ace I am not bidding past game uninvited. I am also interested whether partner is void in hearts. Pass is clearly indicated.
4. 3rd seat W/W. Jxx KJ10xx KQJx x. P 1C 1H 3C; 3H 4C 4H --> 4 ; just too aggressive
5. 1st seat W/R. Kx AK10xx KQJ xxx. 1N - diamond transfer (no invite possible) - 3N. --> 3 ; could work, but against the odds if partner intends to pass the transfer.
Rainer Herrmann
#15
Posted 2012-September-06, 06:51
the hog, on 2012-September-06, 01:50, said:
While I agree that 2D was a poor bid, to me the jump to 4NT on hand 3 is much worse. I wouldn't end my partnership after an aggressive overcall, I like aggressive overcalls, and this is a mistake that can be corrected (especially if it goes for 1100!).
I would understand all the other bids and not even say something about them at the table. While I think that they were all wrong, they all seem to be the thinking kind of mistakes, mistakes that a beginner would probably not make. This is why hand 3 would bother me, that is a not-thinking mistake, and I don't like to play bridge with partners that refuse to think.
- hrothgar
#16
Posted 2012-September-06, 07:21
2...2: I wouldn't make this call, I like to think that p would take me for a slightly better hand. But it may be winning style to do it.
4...3: Silly, why not wait and see if p can make a control bid? But OK we do want to be in slam if we have enough keycards so it could work.
1...2: A bit optimistic but I would do this as well.
5...5: This is really very optimistic. If 3NT is a good contract with p planning to pass 3♦, I suspect p has underbid.
#17
Posted 2012-September-06, 08:01
This was a quick, casual online session. I swear, my bridge instincts and ability with a normal several second pause >> my bridge instincts and ability with a very short pause. Furthermore, the session was injected with a little lighthearted braggadocio and a somewhat carefree attitude toward the (at least bidding) results.
Anyway, the thread was mostly supposed to be funny (hence the opening paragraph), an amusing exercise to decide how far off from real bids these were (I think all were poor), and also to test out people's minimums for these calls.
I'm particularly interested in #2, which was the only one partner actually spoke up about at the table. I'm not even certain whether this is the correct hand type to play it on. I guess the consensus is that it is this hand type, and that everyone would certainly do it if it had, say, another King, or maybe Queen?
#18
Posted 2012-September-06, 08:39
the hog, on 2012-September-06, 01:50, said:
A freakish 2 suiter where I passed for tactical reasons on the first round might be a more likely possibility
Codo, on 2012-September-06, 01:55, said:
With xx,Jx,AK8xx,Qxxx I may had overcalled 2 ♦. This is still very ugly, but it could be right to get the lead in before they reach their best contract.
Thanks. Needing a good 6 card suit with less than an opener makes sense, or maybe as Codo suggests a hand with 5♦-4-not-spades, though we should have better texture than here I suppose.
If we open it up to the possibility that I'm unpassed and the auction went P P 1S ?, unfav, imps, what's your minimum with this shape (4-2-5-2)?
#19
Posted 2012-September-06, 08:42
- hrothgar
#20
Posted 2012-September-06, 08:50
han, on 2012-September-06, 08:42, said:
Thanks. You agree that this is the correct hand type for X, or you agree that you're not certain what hand type is best for this to be?
We have a lot of bids here: X, 2S, 2N, 3C. I'm not certain what they all should mean. One possibility is that X should have >1 ♥ and still the minors, and with this shape I'm supposed to bid one of those other things if I decide I'm worth a call.