BBO Discussion Forums: NAOP District Finals Hand #2 - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

NAOP District Finals Hand #2

#1 User is offline   ArtK78 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,786
  • Joined: 2004-September-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Galloway NJ USA
  • Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
    Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.

Posted 2013-October-21, 08:12

This is a hand from the second qualifying session.

Matchpoints.



1NT is 15-17.

I am going to force the 3 bid on you, as it systemically shows a game forcing (or better) hand with 5-5 in the majors.

Your plan?
0

#2 User is offline   ggwhiz 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,952
  • Joined: 2008-June-23
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2013-October-21, 09:17

Unless you have exclusion here, I don't think I can find the grand without knowing what 4 or 4 would mean from the opener. Mandatory cue-bids? Various non-minimums? etc.

A 4th trump is so important to my grand ambitions and I don't think partner should have it and bid 4 so I'm blasting 6 and hoping for the overtrick on the lead.

That 4th trump is why I would start with stayman, show the 5-5 by jumping to 4 over a 2 response and carry on from there.
When a deaf person goes to court is it still called a hearing?
What is baby oil made of?
0

#3 User is offline   mycroft 

  • Secretary Bird
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,261
  • Joined: 2003-July-12
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Calgary, D18; Chapala, D16

Posted 2013-October-21, 10:25

Yeah, without the meaning of 3NT and 4m, I can't answer.
With those meanings, well, I'm a TD, so I can't play bridge.
What's my cuebidding style? Will partner show kings right away?
Long live the Republic-k. -- Major General J. Golding Frederick (tSCoSI)
0

#4 User is offline   ArtK78 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,786
  • Joined: 2004-September-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Galloway NJ USA
  • Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
    Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.

Posted 2013-October-21, 10:59

Given that I have shown 10 major suit cards, I would think that partner would cue-bid aces in the minors and anything in the majors. But I have to admit that we have not discussed the meaning of bids beyond the initial response.
0

#5 User is offline   quiddity 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,099
  • Joined: 2008-November-21

Posted 2013-October-21, 12:27

With no agreements I guess I'd try 6 followed by 6. I hope this shows a grand try with short clubs.
Another option is to bid 5 and then 6 over partner's 5 - I'm not sure of the difference between these sequences.
0

#6 User is offline   wyman 

  • Redoubling with gusto
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,712
  • Joined: 2009-October-19
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV
  • Interests:Math, Bridge, Beer. Often at the same time.

Posted 2013-October-21, 13:56

Well, at IMPs, I think I bid 6C (or 6D, depending on who's on my right :P).

We either play 6C exclusion or not. If so, I bid 6H over 6D(03) and 7H over 6H(14). If not, I bid 7H over 6D (positive) and pass 6H.

This is a good problem though, and I'm not sure how to think about it at MPs. Maybe I actually want to bid 4N here and angle toward 7N if I can find CA/HK/SK, 6N if we have 2KC but no SK, and 6H otherwise, giving up on the heart grand where partners got all the non-club fillers.
"I think maybe so and so was caught cheating but maybe I don't have the names right". Sure, and I think maybe your mother .... Oh yeah, that was someone else maybe. -- kenberg

"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other.” -- Hamman, re: Wolff
0

#7 User is offline   Endymion77 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 193
  • Joined: 2013-August-18
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bulgaria
  • Interests:NFL, NBA, poker

Posted 2013-October-21, 14:01

5 looks like the best option here although 6 also has some merit and it does scream club void but you should really discuss the responses to 3 with partner.
0

#8 User is offline   ArtK78 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,786
  • Joined: 2004-September-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Galloway NJ USA
  • Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
    Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.

Posted 2013-October-22, 15:19

Here is the whole hand:



My partner opened the South hand 1NT. I heard that he was not the only one to choose this action. Needless to say, I thought I had a pretty good hand as North. I could not think of a great action with the North hand over 4, so I decided to find out if there was going to be a grand in NT. When partner showed the missing key cards I asked for specific kings with 5NT. Partner thought that was good enough for 13 tricks (figuring incorrectly that he had 7 club tricks) and just bid 7NT. I was amazed when he did not claim after the opening lead. I thought that we had about 18 tricks on the auction.

Bidding and making 7NT was a cold top. Only 2 pairs bid a grand in a major. As this was in the second qualifying session, top on a board was 11.
0

#9 User is offline   cherdano 

  • 5555
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,520
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2013-October-23, 15:02

I might be more tempted to open 2NT than 1NT...
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
0

#10 User is offline   ArtK78 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,786
  • Joined: 2004-September-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Galloway NJ USA
  • Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
    Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.

Posted 2013-October-23, 15:33

View Postcherdano, on 2013-October-23, 15:02, said:

I might be more tempted to open 2NT than 1NT...

I believe that my proper response to a 2NT opening bid would be 8NT.
0

#11 User is offline   CSGibson 

  • Tubthumper
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,835
  • Joined: 2007-July-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portland, OR, USA
  • Interests:Bridge, pool, financial crime. New experiences, new people.

Posted 2013-October-23, 16:14

I don't know if anyone has asked in another thread, but how did you wind up?
Chris Gibson
0

#12 User is offline   bd71 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 491
  • Joined: 2009-September-17
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Suburban Philadelphia

Posted 2013-October-23, 16:34

I held the South hand at another table and opoened 1C-1S-3C. Thoughts? How many would open NT?
0

#13 User is offline   wyman 

  • Redoubling with gusto
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,712
  • Joined: 2009-October-19
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV
  • Interests:Math, Bridge, Beer. Often at the same time.

Posted 2013-October-23, 17:01

I'm ok with 1c-2n or 1n but I don't like 1c-3c. 2n straightaway is a bit rich for my blood, but I get it.
"I think maybe so and so was caught cheating but maybe I don't have the names right". Sure, and I think maybe your mother .... Oh yeah, that was someone else maybe. -- kenberg

"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other.” -- Hamman, re: Wolff
0

#14 User is offline   ArtK78 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,786
  • Joined: 2004-September-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Galloway NJ USA
  • Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
    Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.

Posted 2013-October-24, 05:58

View PostCSGibson, on 2013-October-23, 16:14, said:

I don't know if anyone has asked in another thread, but how did you wind up?


4 consecutive 51% sessions for 7th place.
1

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users