sys 2/1.now s bid 3s Forcing or no Forcing?
Page 1 of 1
Forcing or no Forcing?
#2
Posted 2014-September-14, 18:13
lxt08, on 2014-September-14, 17:52, said:
sys 2/1.now s bid 3s Forcing or no Forcing?
Forcing to me.
One may argue that this should show a very weak support and started with 1 NT and trying to stop on a dime, but then I think you will disable yourself from bidding 3♠ with 3 card limit raise bids vs a 18-19 hcp hand which is borderline slam hands.
At MP you may use it NF I guess, since going plus is more important than seeking slams.
"Genius has its own limitations, however stupidity has no such boundaries!"
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#3
Posted 2014-September-14, 18:19
100% force. If Responder has a hand with support but not enough to bid game, he passes. 3S is forcing with mild slam interest.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."
-P.J. Painter.
-P.J. Painter.
#4
Posted 2014-September-14, 18:56
For me, if I have started with 1NT (Forcing) because I have a balanced three-card limit raise for spades, I'm bidding either 3NT or 4♠ at my second call. If I started with 1NT forcing because I haven't got a game force, I pass 2NT, unless given partner's extras I see a game. Anything other than pass is forcing, unless I'm playing Wolff signoff or something.
--------------------
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
#5
Posted 2014-September-15, 01:12
Nf to me. 3h would be forcing because responder may want to offer choice of game with five hearts but other than that, responder knows enough to place the contract
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
#6
Posted 2014-September-15, 01:49
Standard 2/1 lore says 1NT with fit usually shows one of (a) weakish hand or (b) invitational hand.
If 2NT shows a balanced 18-19, then, on "fast arrival" grounds, 3♠ is the invitational hand and 4♠ the weakish one.
If 2NT shows a balanced 18-19, then, on "fast arrival" grounds, 3♠ is the invitational hand and 4♠ the weakish one.
#7
Posted 2014-September-15, 11:33
First question, which raises are go via a 1NT response, only the inv. raise
or the grap raise with 4-7 and fit.
If only the inv. raise, 3S is forcing, 3S should show a fit, without a fit,
why try to play a level higher, to be sucessful, this needs to play at least
2 tricks better.
If the grap raise is part of the 1NT raise, there is a case for NF, but with
22-25 and a major suit fit, I want to play game, NF may make sense at MP, not
so much at IMPs.
With kind regards
Marlowe
or the grap raise with 4-7 and fit.
If only the inv. raise, 3S is forcing, 3S should show a fit, without a fit,
why try to play a level higher, to be sucessful, this needs to play at least
2 tricks better.
If the grap raise is part of the 1NT raise, there is a case for NF, but with
22-25 and a major suit fit, I want to play game, NF may make sense at MP, not
so much at IMPs.
With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
Page 1 of 1