Your lead to trick 6?
JEC Jan10 Board 4
#1
Posted 2015-January-11, 23:37
Your lead to trick 6?
-- Bertrand Russell
#2
Posted 2015-January-12, 01:00
i would have autoplayed diamond in real life
https://www.youtube....hungPlaysBridge
#3
Posted 2015-January-12, 01:18
#4
Posted 2015-January-12, 07:13
Mbodell, on 2015-January-12, 01:18, said:
Construct a deal where playing ♦ is the winner and ♥J is the loser, consistent with your analysis (2 tricks per major suit) I think it is tuff to find such a deal. Playing diamonds now will probably disabling your pd from safe exit when he holds the hand, and if we are planning on taking 4 more tricks, he will be the one expected to hold the hand, obviously more than once.
What is your count signals Michael? How many clubs did pd say he had? If pd showed 4 clubs, then declarer has 4 heart (unless he has 6th trump)., which then ♦ continuation may not hurt. But if pd has 3 clubs and declarer has only 3 hearts, we probably need to play hearts now. Lets say declarer has Axxxx ♠, he ruffs 3rd ♦ and plays A and another ♠ and pd will have no safe exit. Unless he has AK of ♥, which is impossible because then declarer does not have an opening bid.
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#5
Posted 2015-January-12, 07:56
MrAce, on 2015-January-12, 07:13, said:
Well, the only missing club is the queen, and I think we know partner doesn't have that, but he did indeed signal an odd length (UDCA).
-- Bertrand Russell
#6
Posted 2015-January-12, 08:55
mgoetze, on 2015-January-12, 07:56, said:
LOL @ me
Tell your pd no offense intended
Back to the hand, then I think ♥ play is called for, for the reasons I stated already. Declarer will play ♠ A and another next 2 tricks if we play diamonds.
EDIT: Or he can duck 3rd ♦, which I see now when look at hand records, that is what he did. But regardless, main point is to leave pd a safe exit and/or prevent him from being endplayed.
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#7
Posted 2015-January-12, 15:14
#8
Posted 2015-January-12, 15:42
cherdano, on 2015-January-12, 15:14, said:
Did he have a clear opportunity to do so?
-- Bertrand Russell
#9
Posted 2015-January-12, 17:04
mgoetze, on 2015-January-12, 15:42, said:
We already need pd to hold either ♥A or K. He is talking about the presence of ♥ T
♣T-6-5 instead of 6-5-T (same suit count but different S.P)
Which he should have. Assume your pd holds Kxxx instead of KTxx and AJx ♠. Playing ♥ can give up the contract.
But too much info to declarer may wake him up as well. Then he might try to ruff last ♦ at T4, had pd started ♣ T.
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#10
Posted 2015-January-13, 13:32
kuhchung, on 2015-January-12, 01:00, said:
i would have autoplayed diamond in real life
I was afraid that presenting this as a problem would have some influence on the result, the autoplay is what happened to me. I'm not good at recognizing situations where I need to help partner not get endplayed.
N/S at the other table did not face entirely the same problem ...
-- Bertrand Russell
#11
Posted 2015-January-13, 14:15
Honestly I was just being robotic and habitual when I said I'd autoplay a diamond. Just a reflex of not breaking suits, but when I actually decided to figure out how we were beating it, I saw that partner was getting ended
I didn't stop to work out if we could beat it if partner doesn't have the HT
Of course I am not nearly as strong as many of the posters here, so maybe this is easy for them
https://www.youtube....hungPlaysBridge