BBO Discussion Forums: Boldbida Team Match - 10-29 - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Boldbida Team Match - 10-29 Hand 8

Poll: What's your bid? (22 member(s) have cast votes)

What would you rebid as opener?

  1. 2S (18 votes [81.82%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 81.82%

  2. 3S (4 votes [18.18%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 18.18%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   GG_Bridge 

  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 8
  • Joined: 2014-February-18

Posted 2016-October-31, 10:03



Up for discussion is whether Opener invites with 3S or bids 2S after partner's 1S bid.
0

#2 User is offline   Cyberyeti 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,204
  • Joined: 2009-July-13
  • Location:England

Posted 2016-October-31, 10:18

2♠ as is, needs very little to change that, 3-1 in the minors rather than 2-2 would prob be enough for me.
0

#3 User is offline   alok c 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 283
  • Joined: 2015-February-25

Posted 2016-October-31, 10:41

2♠ nothing to be excited about.
0

#4 User is offline   Kaitlyn S 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,092
  • Joined: 2016-July-31
  • Gender:Female

Posted 2016-October-31, 19:10

I bid 2S, but I think it's quite close to 3S. I would bid 3S with either major suit jack.
0

#5 User is offline   nige1 

  • 5-level belongs to me
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,128
  • Joined: 2004-August-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Glasgow Scotland
  • Interests:Poems Computers

Posted 2016-October-31, 20:48

GG_Bridge askes "Up for discussion is whether Opener invites with 3S or bids 2S after partner's 1S bid".

So far a minority of one, I rank
1. 3♠ INV. 5 losers (subtracting a loser for trump control). Well-placed top honours, reinforcing each other. Good intermediates. Game playable opposite minimums like ♠ K x x x ♥ x x ♦ A x x ♣ x x x x
2. 4♠ PRE. Landy Game try :) Slight overbid even for a BoldBida :)
3. 2♠ LIM. Underbid, Might work here but, when the layout is favourable for game, partner often reluctant to take the blame. As I argued in another thread, the LTC (losing trick count) or WTC (winning trick count) is a useful rule of thumb for ordinary players. It helps us to judge hands like this. And to settle arguments, when things go wrong.

Guthrie.tech
0

#6 User is offline   rmnka447 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,366
  • Joined: 2012-March-18
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Illinois
  • Interests:Bridge, Golf, Soccer

Posted 2016-October-31, 23:42

I voted for 2 ♠ also. Just not quite enough for 3 ♠.
0

#7 User is offline   eagles123 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,831
  • Joined: 2011-June-08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:UK Near London
  • Interests:Crystal Palace

Posted 2016-November-01, 02:53

2s - yes it's a max, but we are allowed to have a max.
"definitely that's what I like to play when I'm playing standard - I want to be able to bid diamonds because bidding good suits is important in bridge" - Meckstroth's opinion on weak 2 diamond
0

#8 User is offline   WellSpyder 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,627
  • Joined: 2009-November-30
  • Location:Oxfordshire, England

Posted 2016-November-01, 03:06

View Postnige1, on 2016-October-31, 20:48, said:

So far a minority of one...

I was a bit surprised after voting to see how much of a minority we appear to be. Perhaps I play too much Precision, where 3♠ is more attractive since (a) the opening bid is potentially a bit more shaded and (b) the upper end of the opening bid is much more limited.
0

#9 User is offline   Tramticket 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,103
  • Joined: 2009-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Kent (Near London)

Posted 2016-November-01, 03:32

Add me to the bold 3 spades bidders. All of my points are working in my long suits (only one 10 and one 9, but both are backing up two honours in the long suits). Two aces, only one quack. There are plenty of reasons to upgrade. We are playing teams and I want to encourage partner to bid game.
0

#10 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2016-November-01, 05:39

For mamy europeans this is a no brainer since 2 spades guarantees 4 cards.
BridgeGod: my personal website with interactive problems and articles
0

#11 User is offline   nige1 

  • 5-level belongs to me
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,128
  • Joined: 2004-August-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Glasgow Scotland
  • Interests:Poems Computers

Posted 2016-November-01, 05:50

View PostFluffy, on 2016-November-01, 05:39, said:

For mamy europeans this is a no brainer since 2 spades guarantees 4 cards.
I agree with Fluffy, that it depends on bidding style. Scottish players routinely open 1♥ with poor hands. For example
♠ Q x x x ♥ K Q J x x ♦ J x x ♣ Q
Guthrie.tech
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users