[helene_t]

---

Playing 15-17 5542 (but would open 1♦ with a balanced hand with four diamonds), Walsh (but apparently this 1♠ rebid doesn't promize an unbalanced hand), responder's 3♣ at second turn is apparently forcing (Pavlicek style or some such, not really worked out in details). 4♣ is available as minorwood from either side. North could also start with a splinter or an inverted raise although that in principle denies a four-card major.

Slam is not bad. Clubs 2-1 and either ♠K or ♦A in the right place would give you some 57% and depending on opps' skills and clues from the bidding you may have additional chances, such as for example West leading ♦A (it was matchpoints after all).

Should either partner have done something?

Would it be easier if we were playing your favorite system?

[cherdano]

I would not get there.

[Winstonm]

cherdano, on 2018-January-22, 15:47, said:

I would not get there.

And happy to have not done so.

[nige1]

helene_t, on 2018-January-22, 14:49, said:

Playing 15-17 5542 (but would open 1♦ with a balanced hand with four diamonds), Walsh (but apparently this 1♠ rebid doesn't promize an unbalanced hand), responder's 3♣ at second turn is apparently forcing (Pavlicek style or some such, not really worked out in details). 4♣ is available as minorwood from either side. North could also start with a splinter or an inverted raise although that in principle denies a four-card major.Slam is not bad. Clubs 2-1 and either ♠K or ♦A in the right place would give you some 57% and depending on opps' skills and clues from the bidding you may have additional chances, such as for example West leading ♦A (it was matchpoints after all).Should either partner have done something?Would it be easier if we were playing your favorite system?

Jasmine ♣
With slow red-suit stops and weak ♣ support, it's hard for South to show slam-enthusiasm.

---

[rmnka447]

Slams from 12 opposite 13 hands are usually pretty difficult to bid even if cold.

I don't think I'd get there.

[sfi]

Polish Club would start 1C - 2C (5+, FG); 3C (normally 4+ support) and then it seems we should have a shot. I think the key to getting to a slam is for North to work out there is a 10-card club fit before the partnership passes 3NT. Inverted minors would achieve the same thing, but if your 2C denies a major you are much worse off on this particular hand.

[helene_t]

nige1, on 2018-January-22, 16:28, said:

Jasmine ♣
With slow red-suit stops and weak ♣ support, it's hard for South to show slam-enthusiasm.

---

I would think that if South has shown 10-12 with just 2-4 clubs, the actual hand with its 4-card support and four controls is quite good in context, no?

[Cyberyeti]

Translating what we play to strong no trump which doesn't entirely work as we are GF if balanced:

1♣(4+)-2♣(inverted inv+, not denying 4M)
2♠(nat minimum)-3♥
3N

and now N will visualise the S hand with either ♠AK rather than AQ or ♦KQ or A instead of K or ♥KQ and plough on with 4♣.

This is a very common theme of "we opened a 2 card club and didn't realise we had that big a fit", it's the price you pay.

[cherdano]

Cyberyeti, on 2018-January-22, 16:56, said:

Translating what we play to strong no trump which doesn't entirely work as we are GF if balanced:

1♣(4+)-2♣(inverted inv+, not denying 4M)
2♠(nat minimum)-3♥
3N

and now N will visualise the S hand with either ♠AK rather than AQ or ♦KQ or A instead of K or ♥KQ and plough on with 4♣.

This is a very common theme of "we opened a 2 card club and didn't realise we had that big a fit", it's the price you pay.

I am amazed your North knows that South has no wasted club honours in your 10-card fit!

[nullve]

Using my (nullve-nullve's) system, maybe

1♣-2♣ ("NAT or 11-13/17-19/26+ BAL"; "GF, 5+ C, unBAL")
2♦-2♥ (relay; "13-15")
2♠-2N (relay; "4+ H or 1-suited")
3♣-3♥ (relay; "2425 or 4H6C")
3♠-4♦ (relay, willing to bypass 3N opposite 4H6C; 2416 (then 12-14 hcp))
4♠-5♣ (parity key card ask in ♣; odd # of key cards)
6♣-P (looking stupid opposite e.g. Kx-QJxx-J-KQJxxx; ---).

Or should Opener sign off in 3N over 3♥?

[Cyberyeti]

cherdano, on 2018-January-22, 17:54, said:

I am amazed your North knows that South has no wasted club honours in your 10-card fit!

He doesn't, but ♠AK, ♦A is plenty, the fact that he ploughs on over 3N doesn't commit to slam. More awkward at pairs where 5♣ might be disastrous but fine at teams.

[steve2005]

rmnka447, on 2018-January-22, 16:31, said:

Slams from 12 opposite 13 hands are usually pretty difficult to bid even if cold.

I don't think I'd get there.

Only reason to be in slam is if your swinging. This isn't a great slam.

[FelicityR]

steve2005, on 2018-January-22, 20:53, said:

Only reason to be in slam is if your swinging. This isn't a great slam.

Really!? From the South side of the table it's a brilliant slam, and from the North side it's just short of brilliant. To the poster: I'm apologise for being so direct but your comment is wrong.

[msjennifer]

Seeing all 26 cards,some players can always devise a new system on the table to bid a small slam in clubs which depends on this or that to be well placed. A few super experts with complicated systems may perhaps bid this slam missing the Trump Queen,the Diamond Ace and spade King.
Practically all,I am afraid ,will rest comfortably in 3NT and a few in 5Clubs.

[Tramticket]

---

This is not easy.
- Would I bid 3NT now with South? Definitely at pairs, not sure at IMPs.
- Should North carry on, even if south does bid 3NT? Again, the form of scoring might matter, but probably not I suspect.

[xbabarx]

I'm passing 3nt

[Cyberyeti]

Tramticket, on 2018-January-23, 02:40, said:

---

This is not easy.
- Would I bid 3NT now with South? Definitely at pairs, not sure at IMPs.
- Should North carry on, even if south does bid 3NT? Again, the form of scoring might matter, but probably not I suspect.

Starting with 1N we have to bid this in awkward fashion, and I suspect we do with ♠Kx instead of Jx, but it's a big step with the actual hand.

The auction for us is 1N-2♣-2♠-4♣ slammish, 4♥/5+♣ but if only 5 clubs will be a much bigger hand.

[0deary]

My favourite system: what a lovely question!

I’d never reach 6C

After the 1S I’d reflect:

E/W have ~ 14 points and quite possibly ~9 diamonds but not a peep from them at Match points- what’s going on?

Anyway I’m north and I’m going to be the decider on that particular bridge conversation so I will seek information (rather than give information hoping south can make something of that)

If I ask partner 4th suit 2D now either she will bid 2/3NT or she can’t, but to save time let’s just look at the 2N reply

For 2N I need my partner to have 6 clubs, a diamond on the lead and my Ace hearts= tick. To make 3N partner needs a quick trick too- exactly the Ace spades and not the KQ because the diamond ceiling will otherwise hit our heads. For running 6 clubs I can only really rely on 3 opposite so I need 2-2 or missing Q in finesse, and to rely on AS is by no means a certainty. All in all a bit too much

So at match points I think I’ll just retreat to 3C and hope that gives us a decent MPs return. It’ll be great if either of the black suit misbehave- a great MP in prospect

(If she essays 3N I’m hoping she has more D stops, more tempi to deal with the black suits, and I’d hope for a half decent MP result for our efforts. If she can’t stop D at all then slightly better chances for 5C but I’d likely still need running Clubs- a solid 3C again looks best, certainly not a speculative 6)

[LBengtsson]

4-6/5 canapé style bid with 2/1 can be possibly bid but how to get to 6♣ is not easy. if south bid 1nt second round, hand strength 12-14 balance given opposed to four card ♠ suit, then bid sequence can be 1♣ - 1♥ - 1nt - 2♦(gf) - 2♠ - 3♣(second suit) - ? but i still see declarer play 3nt, not 5♣/6♣

i like inverted minor raise with north hand but cannot do as hold 4 card ♥ suit. so inverted minor should be revised so hand like this can be bid good.

[Cyberyeti]

LBengtsson, on 2018-January-23, 06:19, said:

i like inverted minor raise with north hand but cannot do as hold 4 card ♥ suit. so inverted minor should be revised so hand like this can be bid good.

I tend to find that this is an area where strong NT short club suffers.

Weak NT, 4 card club means handling a non GF inverted raise that may contain a 4 card major is not that difficult, hence you can bid a lot of hands more accurately. The issue is that if the club is balanced it's 15+ so GF. Almost anything better than minimum goes thru an artificial 2♦ over the invert.