Why don't you vote in this poll? If you abstain we want to know why
#1
Posted 2007-October-24, 18:10
#3
Posted 2007-October-24, 18:51
#4
Posted 2007-October-24, 18:52
#5
Posted 2007-October-24, 18:54
jdonn, on Oct 24 2007, 07:52 PM, said:
Helene, Did you use the designer of Florida's election ballets by any chance?
#6
Posted 2007-October-24, 18:57
#7
Posted 2007-October-24, 19:16
cherdano, on Oct 24 2007, 04:57 PM, said:
Well, I voted for myself for consistency. I imagine Arend is just worried that everyone voting the same way will be agreeing with " /or Gnome".
#9
Posted 2007-October-24, 21:22
Matt will kick my ass if I vote any other way.
#10
Posted 2007-October-24, 21:25
Quote
Actually, I was looking to turn this around.

#11
Posted 2007-October-25, 01:53
Time to come back into the Commonwealth and get it right ....
]By
But still one phrase jumps out from Mr Goulds excellent and thorough report. The voter, he says, was treated as an afterthought in planning and organising the May 3 elections.
The prime concern of politicians was . . . politicians. Quite.
And the instant reaction of the political parties? Blame rivals, exonerate themselves.
#13
Posted 2007-October-25, 05:23
joshs, on Oct 25 2007, 02:54 AM, said:
jdonn, on Oct 24 2007, 07:52 PM, said:
Helene, Did you use the designer of Florida's election ballets by any chance?
No, I couldn't get it running under Wine. On advice from Gerardo I downloaded an open-source clone instead.
#14
Posted 2007-October-25, 07:24
helene_t, on Oct 25 2007, 12:10 AM, said:
Wich of the 30 pages should I look at?
#15
Posted 2007-October-25, 08:31
Winstonm, on Oct 24 2007, 10:25 PM, said:
Quote
Actually, I was looking to turn this around.

I see I am not the only one who thought that. LOL!
So many experts, not enough X cards.
#16
Posted 2007-October-25, 09:12
joshs, on Oct 24 2007, 07:51 PM, said:
*must resist urge to pun*
#17
Posted 2007-October-25, 10:55
Fluffy, on Oct 25 2007, 03:24 PM, said:
helene_t, on Oct 25 2007, 12:10 AM, said:
Wich of the 30 pages should I look at?
24-27, starting with Sceptic noting that three BoD members abstained.
#18
Posted 2007-October-25, 11:51
Whether or not people who declare themselves unable to make a fair decision should be replaced or not is another issue, and I shall not comment on this at this time.
As an example, take the case of a murder prosecution. You happen to be the mother of the defendent. Are you suitable to sit on the jury to decide whether or not the accused is guilty?
How about the mother of the victim?
I think this proves that in some cases abstaining is appropriate.
#19
Posted 2007-October-25, 11:53
Quote
How about the mother of the victim?
I think this proves that in some cases abstaining is appropriate.
They dont abstain the step down and another juror found???????????
#20
Posted 2007-October-25, 12:59
sceptic, on Oct 25 2007, 11:53 AM, said:
Quote
How about the mother of the victim?
I think this proves that in some cases abstaining is appropriate.
They dont abstain the step down and another juror found???????????
Maybe there is a difference between a BoD that has to make many decisions, and a jury that essentially only has to make one decision?