4th seat opening bids at 2 level
#1
Posted 2014-March-19, 10:21
In other words are they weak or intermediate range bids for you?
#2
Posted 2014-March-19, 11:17
TWOferBRIDGE
"imo by far in bridge the least understood concept is how to bid over a jump-shift
( 1M-1NT!-3m-?? )." ....Justin Lall
" Did someone mention relays? " .... Zelandakh
K-Rex to Mikeh : " Sometimes you drive me nuts " .
#3
Posted 2014-March-19, 11:45
The first is a sound opening bid. Sort of like the hand where you would open 1♥ and then would want to jump to "two and a half hearts."
The second is a distributional structure, where 2♥ or 2♠ shows a light opening (about 10-14) with five of the major and 4+ clubs. If 2♥ is opened, this shows a spade fragment or doubleton, as well, and more like 12-15 if you are a strict cansino count kind of person. Hence, if 3-card spades, 12-14, while if 2-card, then 13-14. Technically 1-card and 14 is OK.
2♦ is optional, but still an intermediate call. One nice option is 5+ spades with 4+ diamonds and the range above. Another is a light major two-suiter.
-P.J. Painter.
#4
Posted 2014-March-19, 11:51
PS: any votes for a Lee 2♦ in fourth seat (minus the weak 2 in diamonds)?
#5
Posted 2014-March-19, 12:08
This avoids a potentially annoying 1M-1NT-2M-2NT sequence and also makes things hard on the opponents on the hands they are most likely to back in.
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
#6
Posted 2014-March-19, 14:34
#7
Posted 2014-March-20, 09:48
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
#8
Posted 2014-March-20, 13:25
#9
Posted 2014-March-20, 14:24
fromageGB, on 2014-March-20, 13:25, said:
LOL!!!
The opponents usually keep quiet even if you don't preempt, and especially if your non-preempt option is a pass.
-P.J. Painter.
#10
Posted 2014-March-20, 22:06
#12
Posted 2014-March-21, 09:08
TWO4BRIDGE, on 2014-March-19, 11:17, said:
awm, on 2014-March-19, 12:08, said:
This avoids a potentially annoying 1M-1NT-2M-2NT sequence and also makes things hard on the opponents on the hands they are most likely to back in.
I prefer Adam's choice. It even includes the rationale and doesn't let the previous 3 passes force me to change all my opening 1-bid and response structure.