High level decision What's you solution?
#2
Posted 2005-June-09, 12:38
#3 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2005-June-09, 12:57
#4 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2005-June-09, 12:59
#6
Posted 2005-June-09, 14:00
Quote
Note, that rightly or wrongly, we have the agreement that here 4S would not establish a forcing pass - only 3N (artificial) or 4D do so.
#7
Posted 2005-June-09, 14:13
Read in some bridge magazine that the 5 level belongs to the OPP.
My partners prefer I follow Maxims rather than think on my own.
I would bid 3h to not establish a forcing pass then.
#8
Posted 2005-June-09, 14:16
#9
Posted 2005-June-09, 14:33
I agree that this hand is more of a direct 4♠ bid than a 4♦ call -- are we sure we want to set up a forcing pass situation when we may quite possibly have less than half the strength and a substantial amount of our values in a 10+ card fit?
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
#10 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2005-June-09, 14:48
Winstonm, on Jun 9 2005, 03:00 PM, said:
Quote
Note, that rightly or wrongly, we have the agreement that here 4S would not establish a forcing pass - only 3N (artificial) or 4D do so.
yes thats why i wouldnt bid 4D since it sets up an FP (not what i want to do).
#11
Posted 2005-June-09, 15:21
Quote
I would take it you mean that you would always bid on, then? Don't think a passout of 5D is in keeping with your style - if it is, the prom is OFF, LoL.
Close, but might not it be better to hear what partner has to say about bidding on?
WinstonM
#12
Posted 2005-June-09, 15:35
#13 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2005-June-09, 15:51
Winstonm, on Jun 9 2005, 04:21 PM, said:
Quote
I would take it you mean that you would always bid on, then? Don't think a passout of 5D is in keeping with your style - if it is, the prom is OFF, LoL.
Close, but might not it be better to hear what partner has to say about bidding on?
WinstonM
No I just dont see why it cant be their hand. I would bid 4S and if partner cant X then I would bid 5S (as a save) but if he Xed I would pass. The problem with setting up an FP (to me) is that now partner will X with any bad hand and like, xx of diamonds because he doesn't want me to bid 5S. This way we may miss a good save. Also if the opps are sophisticated the 4D bid could put lefty under less pressure as he can X to suggest a save.
#14
Posted 2005-June-09, 17:36
i'd have bid 3h over 3d, just in case, but now i think i'll bid just bid 5s and hope they were making
#15
Posted 2005-June-09, 17:41
Winstonm, on Jun 10 2005, 07:32 AM, said:
Auction:
(S) (W) (N) (E)
1S- 2D- 2S- 3D
4D*-5D- P**-P
?
4D* by agreement establishes a forcing pass situation.
P** I'd rather defend than bid on.
What's your solution?
WOW -- I would NOT have bid 4♦ but an immediate 4♠


#16
Posted 2005-June-10, 03:07
Btw if partner wants to defend when we are in a FP situation, he has to double ! If he passes he indicates a desire to bid on. This is standard, isn't it ?

Alain
#17
Posted 2005-June-10, 07:59
I would not have set up a forcing pass seq. with this hand,
since I am not really interested in slam and not really
interested in defending.
I will get this message across best in bidding 4S, if partner
now doubles, he will have defensive outside spade.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#18
Posted 2005-June-10, 08:46
joker_gib, on Jun 10 2005, 05:07 AM, said:
Btw if partner wants to defend when we are in a FP situation, he has to double ! If he passes he indicates a desire to bid on. This is standard, isn't it ?

Alain
Some people reverse the meaning of pass and double in forcing pass situations. In this case, the problem as posed follows this reverse the normal meaning.
Ben
Auction:
(S) (W) (N) (E)
1S- 2D- 2S- 3D
4D*-5D- P**-P
?
4D* by agreement establishes a forcing pass situation.
P** I'd rather defend than bid on.
What's your solution?